PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SOLZ vs. METC
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SOLZ vs. METC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Solana ETF (SOLZ) and Ramaco Resources, Inc. (METC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SOLZ vs. METC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
SOLZ
Solana ETF
-34.00%-12.47%
METC
Ramaco Resources, Inc.
-14.11%116.58%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SOLZ achieves a -34.00% return, which is significantly lower than METC's -14.11% return.


SOLZ

1D
0.53%
1M
1.47%
YTD
-34.00%
6M
-61.78%
1Y
-40.64%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

METC

1D
7.14%
1M
2.11%
YTD
-14.11%
6M
-53.42%
1Y
102.29%
3Y*
28.59%
5Y*
34.92%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SOLZ vs. METC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SOLZ
SOLZ Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
SOLZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SOLZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
SOLZ Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
SOLZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
SOLZ Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

METC
METC Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
METC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
METC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
METC Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
METC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
METC Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SOLZ vs. METC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Solana ETF (SOLZ) and Ramaco Resources, Inc. (METC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SOLZMETCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.51

1.00

-1.51

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.37

1.82

-2.19

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

1.23

-0.27

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.61

1.38

-1.99

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.15

2.37

-3.52

SOLZ vs. METC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SOLZ Sharpe Ratio is -0.51, which is lower than the METC Sharpe Ratio of 1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SOLZ and METC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SOLZMETCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.51

1.00

-1.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.52

0.05

-0.58

Correlation

The correlation between SOLZ and METC is 0.18, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

SOLZ vs. METC - Dividend Comparison

SOLZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.41%, more than METC's 0.44% yield.


TTM2025202420232022
SOLZ
Solana ETF
3.41%1.75%0.00%0.00%0.00%
METC
Ramaco Resources, Inc.
0.44%1.10%5.32%2.91%5.11%

Drawdowns

SOLZ vs. METC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SOLZ drawdown since its inception was -70.23%, smaller than the maximum METC drawdown of -85.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOLZ and METC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SOLZMETCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.23%

-85.54%

+15.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-70.23%

-75.34%

+5.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-75.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-68.11%

-71.66%

+3.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.47%

-50.18%

+21.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

37.00%

43.84%

-6.84%

Volatility

SOLZ vs. METC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Solana ETF (SOLZ) is 18.65%, while Ramaco Resources, Inc. (METC) has a volatility of 23.92%. This indicates that SOLZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than METC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SOLZMETCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.65%

23.92%

-5.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

58.48%

70.68%

-12.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

79.49%

103.11%

-23.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

79.89%

82.38%

-2.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

79.89%

75.99%

+3.90%