SOLV vs. NLOP
SOLV (Solventum Corp) and NLOP (Net Lease Office Properties) are both stocks. SOLV operates in Medical Instruments & Supplies (Healthcare), while NLOP operates in REIT - Office (Real Estate). Over the past year, SOLV returned 5.52% vs 18.16% for NLOP. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SOLV vs. NLOP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SOLV achieves a -1.11% return, which is significantly lower than NLOP's 11.81% return.
SOLV
- 1D
- 2.53%
- 1M
- 16.19%
- YTD
- -1.11%
- 6M
- -8.08%
- 1Y
- 5.52%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NLOP
- 1D
- -1.98%
- 1M
- -11.29%
- YTD
- 11.81%
- 6M
- 13.44%
- 1Y
- 18.16%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SOLV vs. NLOP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
SOLV Solventum Corp | -1.11% | 19.95% | -17.43% |
NLOP Net Lease Office Properties | 11.81% | 5.88% | 36.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between SOLV and NLOP is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2024 | 0.23 |
Fundamentals
SOLV:
$13.75B
NLOP:
$175.69M
SOLV:
$8.17
NLOP:
-$8.15
SOLV:
1.66
NLOP:
1.94
SOLV:
2.77
NLOP:
1.03
SOLV:
$8.26B
NLOP:
$90.78M
SOLV:
$4.43B
NLOP:
-$8.77M
SOLV:
$2.62B
NLOP:
-$563.00K
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SOLV vs. NLOP — Risk / Return Rank
SOLV
NLOP
SOLV vs. NLOP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Solventum Corp (SOLV) and Net Lease Office Properties (NLOP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SOLV | NLOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.16 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.20 | 1.21 | -1.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.46 | 3.48 | -3.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SOLV | NLOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 | 0.80 | -0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.03 | 1.68 | -1.71 |
Drawdowns
SOLV vs. NLOP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SOLV drawdown since its inception was -39.97%, which is greater than NLOP's maximum drawdown of -19.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOLV and NLOP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SOLV | NLOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.97% | -19.23% | -20.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.46% | -15.03% | -12.43% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.03% | -11.29% | +2.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.48% | -5.73% | -9.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.97% | 5.23% | +6.74% |
Volatility
SOLV vs. NLOP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Solventum Corp (SOLV) is 6.25%, while Net Lease Office Properties (NLOP) has a volatility of 11.33%. This indicates that SOLV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NLOP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SOLV | NLOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.25% | 11.33% | -5.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.13% | 20.00% | +0.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.77% | 22.78% | +3.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.79% | 38.55% | -6.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.79% | 38.55% | -6.76% |
Dividends
SOLV vs. NLOP - Dividend Comparison
SOLV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NLOP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 188.45%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
NLOP Net Lease Office Properties | 188.45% | 27.92% | 0.00% | 1.84% |
SOLV Solventum Corp | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
SOLV vs. NLOP - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Solventum Corp and Net Lease Office Properties. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
SOLV and NLOP have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NLOP has higher volatility (11.33%) compared to SOLV (6.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SOLV dropped -39.97% vs NLOP's -19.23%.
NLOP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.80 vs 0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SOLV and NLOP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer