PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SOLM vs. AMDW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SOLM vs. AMDW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Solana 3% Monthly Option Income ETF (SOLM) and Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SOLM achieves a -45.35% return, which is significantly lower than AMDW's 192.40% return.


SOLM

1D
-5.48%
1M
-17.98%
YTD
-45.35%
6M
-51.02%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AMDW

1D
4.91%
1M
72.80%
YTD
192.40%
6M
186.02%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SOLM vs. AMDW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
SOLM
Amplify Solana 3% Monthly Option Income ETF
-45.35%-15.50%
AMDW
Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF
192.40%-18.24%

Correlation

The correlation between SOLM and AMDW is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2025

0.39

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SOLM vs. AMDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Solana 3% Monthly Option Income ETF (SOLM) and Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SOLM vs. AMDW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SOLMAMDWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-1.14

4.83

-5.97

Drawdowns

SOLM vs. AMDW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SOLM drawdown since its inception was -57.72%, which is greater than AMDW's maximum drawdown of -34.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOLM and AMDW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SOLMAMDWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.72%

-34.64%

-23.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-57.72%

0.00%

-57.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.34%

-14.66%

-20.68%

Volatility

SOLM vs. AMDW - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SOLMAMDWDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

65.43%

81.56%

-16.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

65.43%

81.56%

-16.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

65.43%

81.56%

-16.13%

SOLM vs. AMDW - Expense Ratio Comparison

SOLM has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than AMDW's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

SOLM vs. AMDW - Dividend Comparison

SOLM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 35.68%, more than AMDW's 28.98% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


SOLM and AMDW have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SOLM is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SOLM is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for AMDW.

SOLM has the higher dividend yield at 35.68%, compared with 28.98% for AMDW.

They also come from different issuers: Amplify and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for SOLM and 0.99% for AMDW.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SOLM and AMDW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer