SOLL.TO vs. KILO.TO
SOLL.TO (Purpose Solana ETF Currency Hedged Units) and KILO.TO (Purpose Gold Bullion Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - SOLL.TO is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Purpose Investments, while KILO.TO is a Gold fund actively managed by Purpose Investments. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SOLL.TO returned -52.02% vs 16.96% for KILO.TO. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SOLL.TO charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for KILO.TO.
Performance
SOLL.TO vs. KILO.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SOLL.TO achieves a -45.24% return, which is significantly lower than KILO.TO's -8.68% return.
SOLL.TO
- 1D
- -5.08%
- 1M
- -18.41%
- YTD
- -45.24%
- 6M
- -45.63%
- 1Y
- -52.02%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KILO.TO
- 1D
- -3.18%
- 1M
- -12.27%
- YTD
- -8.68%
- 6M
- -12.08%
- 1Y
- 16.96%
- 3Y*
- 25.38%
- 5Y*
- 15.98%
- 10Y*
- —
SOLL.TO vs. KILO.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SOLL.TO Purpose Solana ETF Currency Hedged Units | -45.24% | -4.02% |
KILO.TO Purpose Gold Bullion Fund | -8.68% | 31.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between SOLL.TO and KILO.TO is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2025 | 0.16 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SOLL.TO vs. KILO.TO — Risk / Return Rank
SOLL.TO
KILO.TO
SOLL.TO vs. KILO.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Purpose Solana ETF Currency Hedged Units (SOLL.TO) and Purpose Gold Bullion Fund (KILO.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SOLL.TO | KILO.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 1.14 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.70 | 0.63 | -1.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.08 | 1.77 | -2.85 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SOLL.TO vs. KILO.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SOLL.TO drawdown since its inception was -75.04%, which is greater than KILO.TO's maximum drawdown of -26.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOLL.TO and KILO.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SOLL.TO | KILO.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.04% | -26.91% | -48.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -75.04% | -26.91% | -48.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -26.91% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.91% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -72.92% | -26.91% | -46.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.28% | -6.80% | -29.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 48.26% | 9.58% | +38.68% |
Volatility
SOLL.TO vs. KILO.TO - Volatility Comparison
Purpose Solana ETF Currency Hedged Units (SOLL.TO) has a higher volatility of 21.75% compared to Purpose Gold Bullion Fund (KILO.TO) at 8.35%. This indicates that SOLL.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KILO.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SOLL.TO | KILO.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.75% | 8.35% | +13.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 50.55% | 23.81% | +26.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 73.15% | 27.43% | +45.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 71.88% | 18.18% | +53.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 71.88% | 17.90% | +53.98% |
SOLL.TO vs. KILO.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
SOLL.TO has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than KILO.TO's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
SOLL.TO vs. KILO.TO - Dividend Comparison
Neither SOLL.TO nor KILO.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KILO.TO Purpose Gold Bullion Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.41% |
SOLL.TO Purpose Solana ETF Currency Hedged Units | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SOLL.TO and KILO.TO have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, KILO.TO is cheaper at 0.28% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
KILO.TO is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for SOLL.TO.
SOLL.TO is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while KILO.TO is Gold. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for SOLL.TO and 0.28% for KILO.TO.
Find the right allocation for SOLL.TO and KILO.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer