SOLA.TO vs. EBIT.TO

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

SOLA.TO (Evolve Solana ETF) and EBIT.TO (Evolve Bitcoin ETF CAD) are both Cryptocurrency funds from Evolve. SOLA.TO is actively managed, while EBIT.TO is passively managed. Over the past year, SOLA.TO returned -52.10% vs -43.84% for EBIT.TO. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure.

Performance

SOLA.TO vs. EBIT.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Evolve Solana ETF (SOLA.TO) and Evolve Bitcoin ETF CAD (EBIT.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SOLA.TO achieves a -37.77% return, which is significantly lower than EBIT.TO's -24.72% return.

SOLA.TO

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 1.60%
• 6M: -48.18%
• YTD: -37.77%
• 1Y: -52.10%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EBIT.TO

• 1D: 0.41%
• 1M: -2.19%
• 6M: -33.24%
• YTD: -24.72%
• 1Y: -43.84%
• 3Y*: 29.54%
• 5Y*: 15.61%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SOLA.TO vs. EBIT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SOLA.TO Evolve Solana ETF	-37.77%	-5.66%
EBIT.TO Evolve Bitcoin ETF CAD	-24.72%	1.25%

Correlation

The correlation between SOLA.TO and EBIT.TO is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2025	0.84

The correlation between SOLA.TO and EBIT.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SOLA.TO vs. EBIT.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SOLA.TO

SOLA.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4
SOLA.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
SOLA.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
SOLA.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4
SOLA.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
SOLA.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4

EBIT.TO

EBIT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2
EBIT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
EBIT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
EBIT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 2
EBIT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
EBIT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SOLA.TO vs. EBIT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Evolve Solana ETF (SOLA.TO) and Evolve Bitcoin ETF CAD (EBIT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SOLA.TO	EBIT.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.71	-1.01	+0.30
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.90	-1.49	+0.59
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.90	0.83	+0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.70	-0.83	+0.13
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.02	-1.30	+0.27

SOLA.TO vs. EBIT.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SOLA.TO Sharpe Ratio is -0.71, which is comparable to the EBIT.TO Sharpe Ratio of -1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SOLA.TO and EBIT.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SOLA.TO vs. EBIT.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SOLA.TO drawdown since its inception was -74.77%, roughly equal to the maximum EBIT.TO drawdown of -75.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOLA.TO and EBIT.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	SOLA.TO	EBIT.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-74.77%	-75.45%	+0.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-74.77%	-53.08%	-21.69%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-53.08%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-75.45%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-69.27%	-48.58%	-20.69%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-38.22%	-33.40%	-4.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	51.04%	33.82%	+17.22%

Volatility

SOLA.TO vs. EBIT.TO - Volatility Comparison

Evolve Solana ETF (SOLA.TO) has a higher volatility of 20.39% compared to Evolve Bitcoin ETF CAD (EBIT.TO) at 10.23%. This indicates that SOLA.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EBIT.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SOLA.TO	EBIT.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	20.39%	10.23%	+10.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	52.36%	34.06%	+18.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	74.24%	43.73%	+30.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	72.52%	52.89%	+19.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	72.52%	54.54%	+17.98%

Dividends

SOLA.TO vs. EBIT.TO - Dividend Comparison

Neither SOLA.TO nor EBIT.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SOLA.TO and EBIT.TO in my portfolio?

SOLA.TO and EBIT.TO have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.