SOIL.TO vs. ATH.TO
SOIL.TO (Saturn Oil & Gas Inc) and ATH.TO (Athabasca Oil Corporation) are both stocks. Both operate in the Oil & Gas E&P industry within the Energy sector. Over the past 10 years, SOIL.TO returned 12.35%/yr vs 23.22%/yr for ATH.TO. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SOIL.TO vs. ATH.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SOIL.TO achieves a 190.12% return, which is significantly higher than ATH.TO's 63.02% return. Over the past 10 years, SOIL.TO has underperformed ATH.TO with an annualized return of 12.35%, while ATH.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 23.22% annualized return.
SOIL.TO
- 1D
- -4.99%
- 1M
- 7.63%
- YTD
- 190.12%
- 6M
- 142.27%
- 1Y
- 293.85%
- 3Y*
- 45.90%
- 5Y*
- 15.70%
- 10Y*
- 12.35%
ATH.TO
- 1D
- -4.58%
- 1M
- -0.43%
- YTD
- 63.02%
- 6M
- 46.73%
- 1Y
- 116.23%
- 3Y*
- 57.56%
- 5Y*
- 70.30%
- 10Y*
- 23.22%
SOIL.TO vs. ATH.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SOIL.TO Saturn Oil & Gas Inc | 190.12% | 12.50% | -1.82% | -6.38% | -40.36% | 79.09% | -21.43% | -26.32% | 26.67% | 87.50% |
ATH.TO Athabasca Oil Corporation | 63.02% | 31.89% | 27.82% | 73.03% | 102.52% | 600.00% | -71.19% | -40.40% | -7.48% | -47.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between SOIL.TO and ATH.TO is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2010 | 0.17 |
Over the past year, SOIL.TO and ATH.TO have become more correlated (0.58) than their long-term average of 0.17, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
SOIL.TO:
CA$1.28B
ATH.TO:
CA$5.57B
SOIL.TO:
CA$0.16
ATH.TO:
CA$0.44
SOIL.TO:
42.85
ATH.TO:
25.92
SOIL.TO:
0.07
ATH.TO:
0.99
SOIL.TO:
1.48
ATH.TO:
4.21
SOIL.TO:
1.52
ATH.TO:
3.02
SOIL.TO:
CA$936.17M
ATH.TO:
CA$1.35B
SOIL.TO:
CA$389.19M
ATH.TO:
CA$518.18M
SOIL.TO:
CA$573.40M
ATH.TO:
CA$505.02M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SOIL.TO vs. ATH.TO — Risk / Return Rank
SOIL.TO
ATH.TO
SOIL.TO vs. ATH.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Saturn Oil & Gas Inc (SOIL.TO) and Athabasca Oil Corporation (ATH.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SOIL.TO | ATH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.74 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.68 | 1.46 | +0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 13.05 | 6.27 | +6.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 38.26 | 18.66 | +19.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SOIL.TO | ATH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.82 | 3.09 | +2.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 | 1.42 | -1.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.16 | 0.38 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.02 | -0.02 | +0.05 |
Drawdowns
SOIL.TO vs. ATH.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SOIL.TO drawdown since its inception was -93.67%, smaller than the maximum ATH.TO drawdown of -99.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOIL.TO and ATH.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SOIL.TO | ATH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.67% | -99.41% | +5.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.68% | -18.65% | -4.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -54.67% | -25.62% | -29.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -68.52% | -43.37% | -25.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -77.33% | -94.63% | +17.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -55.38% | -38.42% | -16.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -76.56% | -73.70% | -2.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.72% | 6.25% | +1.47% |
Volatility
SOIL.TO vs. ATH.TO - Volatility Comparison
Saturn Oil & Gas Inc (SOIL.TO) has a higher volatility of 16.06% compared to Athabasca Oil Corporation (ATH.TO) at 12.69%. This indicates that SOIL.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ATH.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SOIL.TO | ATH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.06% | 12.69% | +3.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 43.04% | 31.29% | +11.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.87% | 37.88% | +12.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 53.51% | 49.73% | +3.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 76.76% | 61.67% | +15.09% |
Dividends
SOIL.TO vs. ATH.TO - Dividend Comparison
Neither SOIL.TO nor ATH.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
SOIL.TO vs. ATH.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Saturn Oil & Gas Inc and Athabasca Oil Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SOIL.TO vs. ATH.TO - Profitability Comparison
SOIL.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Saturn Oil & Gas Inc reported a gross profit of 73.97M and revenue of 244.88M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 30.2%.
ATH.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Athabasca Oil Corporation reported a gross profit of 134.91M and revenue of 377.38M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.8%.
SOIL.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Saturn Oil & Gas Inc reported an operating income of 65.29M and revenue of 244.88M, resulting in an operating margin of 26.7%.
ATH.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Athabasca Oil Corporation reported an operating income of 90.74M and revenue of 377.38M, resulting in an operating margin of 24.0%.
SOIL.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Saturn Oil & Gas Inc reported a net income of -97.32M and revenue of 244.88M, resulting in a net margin of -39.7%.
ATH.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Athabasca Oil Corporation reported a net income of 46.29M and revenue of 377.38M, resulting in a net margin of 12.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SOIL.TO and ATH.TO have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for SOIL.TO and ATH.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer