PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
ATH.TO vs. MEG.TO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


ATH.TOMEG.TO
YTD Return22.54%11.14%
1Y Return27.11%-1.62%
3Y Return (Ann)56.12%34.46%
5Y Return (Ann)67.27%36.96%
10Y Return (Ann)5.25%-0.07%
Sharpe Ratio0.71-0.08
Sortino Ratio1.190.10
Omega Ratio1.141.01
Calmar Ratio0.30-0.04
Martin Ratio3.13-0.16
Ulcer Index7.78%14.41%
Daily Std Dev34.40%30.53%
Max Drawdown-99.44%-97.68%
Current Drawdown-72.54%-50.06%

Fundamentals


ATH.TOMEG.TO
Market CapCA$2.68BCA$6.71B
EPSCA$0.39CA$1.84
PE Ratio12.8513.87
PEG Ratio0.20-0.12
Total Revenue (TTM)CA$1.34BCA$5.74B
Gross Profit (TTM)CA$507.04MCA$1.40B
EBITDA (TTM)CA$340.30MCA$1.13B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.6

The correlation between ATH.TO and MEG.TO is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

ATH.TO vs. MEG.TO - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, ATH.TO achieves a 22.54% return, which is significantly higher than MEG.TO's 11.14% return. Over the past 10 years, ATH.TO has outperformed MEG.TO with an annualized return of 5.25%, while MEG.TO has yielded a comparatively lower -0.07% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.48%
-15.89%
ATH.TO
MEG.TO

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

ATH.TO vs. MEG.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Athabasca Oil Corporation (ATH.TO) and MEG Energy Corp. (MEG.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ATH.TO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ATH.TO, currently valued at 0.60, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.60
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for ATH.TO, currently valued at 1.06, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.06
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for ATH.TO, currently valued at 1.13, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.13
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for ATH.TO, currently valued at 0.24, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.24
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for ATH.TO, currently valued at 2.63, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.002.63
MEG.TO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MEG.TO, currently valued at -0.15, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-0.15
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for MEG.TO, currently valued at 0.00, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.00
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for MEG.TO, currently valued at 1.00, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.00
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for MEG.TO, currently valued at -0.07, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.07
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for MEG.TO, currently valued at -0.34, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.00-0.34

ATH.TO vs. MEG.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ATH.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.71, which is higher than the MEG.TO Sharpe Ratio of -0.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ATH.TO and MEG.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.60
-0.15
ATH.TO
MEG.TO

Dividends

ATH.TO vs. MEG.TO - Dividend Comparison

ATH.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MEG.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%.


TTM
ATH.TO
Athabasca Oil Corporation
0.00%
MEG.TO
MEG Energy Corp.
0.38%

Drawdowns

ATH.TO vs. MEG.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ATH.TO drawdown since its inception was -99.44%, roughly equal to the maximum MEG.TO drawdown of -97.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATH.TO and MEG.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-75.00%-70.00%-65.00%-60.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-81.02%
-66.08%
ATH.TO
MEG.TO

Volatility

ATH.TO vs. MEG.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Athabasca Oil Corporation (ATH.TO) is 8.04%, while MEG Energy Corp. (MEG.TO) has a volatility of 9.29%. This indicates that ATH.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MEG.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


6.00%7.00%8.00%9.00%10.00%11.00%12.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
8.04%
9.29%
ATH.TO
MEG.TO

Financials

ATH.TO vs. MEG.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Athabasca Oil Corporation and MEG Energy Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in CAD except per share items