SOFR vs. RMIF

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Amplify Samsung SOFR ETF (SOFR) and LHA Risk-Managed Income ETF (RMIF).

SOFR and RMIF are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SOFR is a passively managed fund by Amplify that tracks the performance of the Secured Overnight Financing Rate. It was launched on Nov 14, 2023. RMIF is an actively managed fund by Little Harbor Advisors. It was launched on Jun 8, 2023.

Performance

SOFR vs. RMIF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Samsung SOFR ETF (SOFR) and LHA Risk-Managed Income ETF (RMIF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

SOFR vs. RMIF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
SOFR Amplify Samsung SOFR ETF	0.87%	4.27%	1.20%
RMIF LHA Risk-Managed Income ETF	-1.49%	4.36%	1.54%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SOFR achieves a 0.87% return, which is significantly higher than RMIF's -1.49% return.

SOFR

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: -0.01%
• YTD: 0.87%
• 6M: 1.90%
• 1Y: 4.09%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RMIF

• 1D: 0.41%
• 1M: -1.27%
• YTD: -1.49%
• 6M: -0.40%
• 1Y: 2.67%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SOFR vs. RMIF - Expense Ratio Comparison

SOFR has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than RMIF's 1.38% expense ratio.

RMIF

LHA Risk-Managed Income ETF

SOFR

Amplify Samsung SOFR ETF

Return for Risk

SOFR vs. RMIF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SOFR

SOFR Risk / Return Rank: 99
SOFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
SOFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
SOFR Omega Ratio Rank: 99
SOFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
SOFR Martin Ratio Rank: 99

RMIF

RMIF Risk / Return Rank: 42
RMIF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
RMIF Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
RMIF Omega Ratio Rank: 44
RMIF Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
RMIF Martin Ratio Rank: 40

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SOFR vs. RMIF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Samsung SOFR ETF (SOFR) and LHA Risk-Managed Income ETF (RMIF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SOFR	RMIF	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	5.07	0.85	+4.22
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	7.43	1.11	+6.32
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	3.76	1.18	+2.59
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	10.09	1.10	+8.98
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	42.82	3.82	+38.99
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SOFR vs. RMIF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SOFR Sharpe Ratio is 5.07, which is higher than the RMIF Sharpe Ratio of 0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SOFR and RMIF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SOFR	RMIF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.07	0.85	+4.22
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	4.99	1.91	+3.09

Correlation

The correlation between SOFR and RMIF is -0.01. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.

Dividends

SOFR vs. RMIF - Dividend Comparison

SOFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.07%, less than RMIF's 5.63% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023
SOFR Amplify Samsung SOFR ETF	4.07%	4.22%	1.60%	0.00%
RMIF LHA Risk-Managed Income ETF	5.63%	5.70%	6.61%	3.70%

Drawdowns

SOFR vs. RMIF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SOFR drawdown since its inception was -0.41%, smaller than the maximum RMIF drawdown of -3.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOFR and RMIF.

Drawdown Indicators

	SOFR	RMIF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.41%	-3.01%	+2.60%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.41%	-2.37%	+1.96%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.01%	-1.95%	+1.94%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.03%	-0.31%	+0.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.10%	0.68%	-0.58%

Volatility

SOFR vs. RMIF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amplify Samsung SOFR ETF (SOFR) is 0.08%, while LHA Risk-Managed Income ETF (RMIF) has a volatility of 1.56%. This indicates that SOFR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RMIF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SOFR	RMIF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.08%	1.56%	-1.48%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.76%	2.19%	-1.43%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81%	3.15%	-2.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.85%	2.62%	-1.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.85%	2.62%	-1.77%