PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SOFR vs. ABI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SOFR vs. ABI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Samsung SOFR ETF (SOFR) and VictoryShares Pioneer Asset-Based Income ETF (ABI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SOFR achieves a 1.89% return, which is significantly lower than ABI's 3.08% return.


SOFR

1D
-0.00%
1M
0.29%
6M
1.83%
YTD
1.89%
1Y
3.88%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ABI

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.32%
6M
2.61%
YTD
3.08%
1Y
5.25%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SOFR vs. ABI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SOFR and ABI is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025

0.14

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SOFR vs. ABI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SOFR
SOFR Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
SOFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SOFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
SOFR Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
SOFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
SOFR Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

ABI
ABI Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
ABI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABI Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
ABI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABI Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SOFR vs. ABI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Samsung SOFR ETF (SOFR) and VictoryShares Pioneer Asset-Based Income ETF (ABI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SOFRABIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

3.32

2.01

+1.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

9.60

5.55

+4.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

38.87

16.81

+22.06

SOFR vs. ABI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SOFR Sharpe Ratio is 4.56, which is comparable to the ABI Sharpe Ratio of 4.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SOFR and ABI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SOFR vs. ABI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SOFR drawdown since its inception was -0.41%, smaller than the maximum ABI drawdown of -0.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOFR and ABI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SOFRABIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.41%

-0.95%

+0.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.41%

-0.95%

+0.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.00%

-0.05%

+0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.03%

-0.17%

+0.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.10%

0.31%

-0.21%

Volatility

SOFR vs. ABI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amplify Samsung SOFR ETF (SOFR) is 0.22%, while VictoryShares Pioneer Asset-Based Income ETF (ABI) has a volatility of 0.35%. This indicates that SOFR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ABI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SOFRABIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.22%

0.35%

-0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.59%

0.81%

-0.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86%

1.28%

-0.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.83%

1.26%

-0.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.83%

1.26%

-0.43%

SOFR vs. ABI - Expense Ratio Comparison

SOFR has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than ABI's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

SOFR vs. ABI - Dividend Comparison

SOFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.89%, less than ABI's 6.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
ABI
VictoryShares Pioneer Asset-Based Income ETF
6.21%3.01%0.00%
SOFR
Amplify Samsung SOFR ETF
3.89%4.22%1.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


SOFR and ABI have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ABI has higher volatility (0.35%) compared to SOFR (0.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SOFR dropped -0.41% vs ABI's -0.95%.

On 1-year performance, ABI leads with 5.25% vs 3.88% for SOFR. On fees, SOFR is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, SOFR has been the lower-risk option at 0.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ABI has performed better with a 5.25% return vs 3.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SOFR is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ABI.

ABI has the higher dividend yield at 6.21%, compared with 3.89% for SOFR.

They also come from different issuers: Amplify and VictoryShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SOFR and 0.65% for ABI.

SOFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.56 vs 4.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SOFR and ABI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer