SOFI vs. KMLM
SOFI (SoFi Technologies, Inc.) is a stock, while KMLM (KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF) is Systematic Trend fund tracking the KFA MLM Index. Over the past 5 years, SOFI returned 1.93%/yr vs 5.46%/yr for KMLM. Their -0.12 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past.
Performance
SOFI vs. KMLM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SOFI achieves a -31.13% return, which is significantly lower than KMLM's 10.64% return.
SOFI
- 1D
- 10.55%
- 1M
- -1.15%
- 6M
- -18.34%
- YTD
- -31.13%
- 1Y
- -15.07%
- 3Y*
- 23.81%
- 5Y*
- 1.93%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.10%
KMLM
- 1D
- -2.05%
- 1M
- 4.67%
- 6M
- 8.67%
- YTD
- 10.64%
- 1Y
- 15.77%
- 3Y*
- -0.31%
- 5Y*
- 5.46%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 7.06%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $10.28M | $9.90M | $7.93M | |
| $1.51B | $1.50B | $1.36B |
SOFI vs. KMLM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SOFI SoFi Technologies, Inc. | -31.13% | 70.00% | 54.77% | 115.84% | -70.84% | 27.09% | 17.36% |
KMLM KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF | 10.64% | -2.98% | -1.69% | -5.66% | 30.61% | 7.04% | 5.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between SOFI and KMLM is -0.16, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | -0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2020 | -0.12 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SOFI vs. KMLM — Risk / Return Rank
SOFI
KMLM
SOFI vs. KMLM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SoFi Technologies, Inc. (SOFI) and KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF (KMLM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SOFI | KMLM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.25 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.29 | 1.65 | -1.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.45 | 5.33 | -5.78 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SOFI vs. KMLM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SOFI drawdown since its inception was -83.32%, which is greater than KMLM's maximum drawdown of -27.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOFI and KMLM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SOFI | KMLM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.32% | -27.47% | -55.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -52.96% | -9.61% | -43.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -52.96% | -22.28% | -30.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -81.54% | -27.47% | -54.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -44.02% | -13.73% | -30.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -51.07% | -12.79% | -38.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 33.40% | 2.97% | +30.43% |
Volatility
SOFI vs. KMLM - Volatility Comparison
SoFi Technologies, Inc. (SOFI) has a higher volatility of 20.01% compared to KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF (KMLM) at 4.35%. This indicates that SOFI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KMLM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SOFI | KMLM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.01% | 4.35% | +15.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.48% | 10.24% | +30.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 57.35% | 11.68% | +45.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 66.64% | 14.55% | +52.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 71.63% | 14.68% | +56.95% |
Dividends
SOFI vs. KMLM - Dividend Comparison
SOFI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KMLM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.54%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KMLM KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF | 4.54% | 5.02% | 0.82% | 0.00% | 13.22% | 6.94% |
SOFI SoFi Technologies, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SOFI and KMLM have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SOFI has higher volatility (20.01%) compared to KMLM (4.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SOFI dropped -83.32% vs KMLM's -27.47%.
KMLM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs -0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SOFI and KMLM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer