PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SOEZ vs. XUDV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SOEZ vs. XUDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Solana ETF (SOEZ) and Franklin U.S. Dividend Booster Index ETF (XUDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SOEZ achieves a -38.34% return, which is significantly lower than XUDV's 27.66% return.


SOEZ

1D
0.23%
1M
-7.83%
6M
-24.32%
YTD
-38.34%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

XUDV

1D
1.53%
1M
4.56%
6M
19.04%
YTD
27.66%
1Y
34.28%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
23.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$83.53K$76.74K$179.41K
$513.07K$322.84K$396.56K

SOEZ vs. XUDV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
SOEZ
Franklin Solana ETF
-38.34%-11.69%
XUDV
Franklin U.S. Dividend Booster Index ETF
27.66%1.44%

Correlation

The correlation between SOEZ and XUDV is 0.30, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2025

0.30

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SOEZ vs. XUDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SOEZ

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


XUDV
XUDV Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
XUDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XUDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
XUDV Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
XUDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
XUDV Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SOEZ vs. XUDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Solana ETF (SOEZ) and Franklin U.S. Dividend Booster Index ETF (XUDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SOEZXUDVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.92

SOEZ vs. XUDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SOEZ vs. XUDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SOEZ drawdown since its inception was -56.14%, which is greater than XUDV's maximum drawdown of -15.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOEZ and XUDV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SOEZXUDVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.14%

-15.98%

-40.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-48.18%

0.00%

-48.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.17%

-1.96%

-33.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.82%

Volatility

SOEZ vs. XUDV - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SOEZXUDVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

67.99%

12.38%

+55.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

67.99%

16.00%

+51.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

67.99%

16.00%

+51.99%

SOEZ vs. XUDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

SOEZ has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than XUDV's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SOEZ vs. XUDV - Dividend Comparison

SOEZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.84%, less than XUDV's 3.27% yield.


PositionTTM2025
SOEZ
Franklin Solana ETF
1.84%0.00%
XUDV
Franklin U.S. Dividend Booster Index ETF
3.27%3.80%

Frequently Asked Questions


SOEZ and XUDV have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XUDV is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XUDV is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for SOEZ.

XUDV has the higher dividend yield at 3.27%, compared with 1.84% for SOEZ.

SOEZ is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while XUDV is Dividend. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for SOEZ and 0.09% for XUDV.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SOEZ and XUDV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer