SOEZ vs. ISCMF

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

SOEZ (Franklin Solana ETF) and ISCMF (iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SOEZ is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Franklin, while ISCMF is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Index. SOEZ is actively managed, while ISCMF is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.17, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.19% expense ratio.

Performance

SOEZ vs. ISCMF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Solana ETF (SOEZ) and iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SOEZ achieves a -43.12% return, which is significantly lower than ISCMF's 22.87% return.

SOEZ

• 1D: -3.99%
• 1M: -20.02%
• YTD: -43.12%
• 6M: -49.50%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ISCMF

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -0.67%
• YTD: 22.87%
• 6M: 22.87%
• 1Y: 37.85%
• 3Y*: 15.20%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SOEZ vs. ISCMF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SOEZ Franklin Solana ETF	-43.12%	-11.97%
ISCMF iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF	22.87%	3.98%

Correlation

The correlation between SOEZ and ISCMF is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2025	-0.17

Return for Risk

SOEZ vs. ISCMF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ISCMF

ISCMF Risk / Return Rank: 84
ISCMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
ISCMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
ISCMF Omega Ratio Rank: 99
ISCMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
ISCMF Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SOEZ vs. ISCMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Solana ETF (SOEZ) and iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SOEZ	ISCMF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.05	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-1.10	0.45	-1.55

Drawdowns

SOEZ vs. ISCMF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SOEZ drawdown since its inception was -52.20%, which is greater than ISCMF's maximum drawdown of -25.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOEZ and ISCMF.

Drawdown Indicators

	SOEZ	ISCMF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-52.20%	-25.42%	-26.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-5.69%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-7.62%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-52.20%	-5.26%	-46.94%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-30.97%	-13.42%	-17.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.44%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SOEZ	ISCMF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	7.14%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	15.90%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	68.82%	18.53%	+50.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	68.82%	14.37%	+54.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	68.82%	14.37%	+54.45%

SOEZ vs. ISCMF - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SOEZ and ISCMF have an expense ratio of 0.19%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

SOEZ vs. ISCMF - Dividend Comparison

SOEZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%, while ISCMF has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM
ISCMF iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF	0.00%
SOEZ Franklin Solana ETF	0.59%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SOEZ and ISCMF in my portfolio?

SOEZ and ISCMF have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SOEZ or ISCMF?

Both ETFs have the same 0.19% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SOEZ or ISCMF?

SOEZ and ISCMF have the same expense ratio: 0.19% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SOEZ or ISCMF?

SOEZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.59%, compared with 0.00% for ISCMF.

What is the main difference between SOEZ and ISCMF?

SOEZ is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while ISCMF is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Franklin and iShares.