SOEZ vs. ISCMF
SOEZ (Franklin Solana ETF) and ISCMF (iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SOEZ is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Franklin, while ISCMF is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Index. SOEZ is actively managed, while ISCMF is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.18, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.19% expense ratio.
Performance
SOEZ vs. ISCMF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SOEZ achieves a -36.03% return, which is significantly lower than ISCMF's 11.96% return.
SOEZ
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 3.02%
- 6M
- -46.25%
- YTD
- -36.03%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ISCMF
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -8.88%
- 6M
- 11.96%
- YTD
- 11.96%
- 1Y
- 22.55%
- 3Y*
- 10.82%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SOEZ vs. ISCMF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SOEZ Franklin Solana ETF | -36.03% | -11.69% |
ISCMF iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF | 11.96% | 3.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between SOEZ and ISCMF is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2025 | -0.18 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SOEZ vs. ISCMF — Risk / Return Rank
SOEZ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ISCMF
SOEZ vs. ISCMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Solana ETF (SOEZ) and iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SOEZ | ISCMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.84 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.66 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 6.61 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SOEZ vs. ISCMF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SOEZ drawdown since its inception was -56.14%, which is greater than ISCMF's maximum drawdown of -25.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOEZ and ISCMF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SOEZ | ISCMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.14% | -25.42% | -30.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -13.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.68% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -46.25% | -13.68% | -32.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.03% | -13.31% | -20.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.42% | — |
Volatility
SOEZ vs. ISCMF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SOEZ | ISCMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.30% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 18.12% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 70.42% | 19.58% | +50.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 70.42% | 14.82% | +55.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 70.42% | 14.82% | +55.60% |
SOEZ vs. ISCMF - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SOEZ and ISCMF have an expense ratio of 0.19%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SOEZ vs. ISCMF - Dividend Comparison
SOEZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, while ISCMF has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
ISCMF iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF | 0.00% |
SOEZ Franklin Solana ETF | 0.86% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SOEZ and ISCMF have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.19% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SOEZ and ISCMF have the same expense ratio: 0.19% per year.
SOEZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.86%, compared with 0.00% for ISCMF.
SOEZ is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while ISCMF is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Franklin and iShares.
Find the right allocation for SOEZ and ISCMF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer