PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SOEZ vs. CMDY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SOEZ vs. CMDY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Solana ETF (SOEZ) and iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF (CMDY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SOEZ achieves a -43.12% return, which is significantly lower than CMDY's 24.16% return.


SOEZ

1D
-3.99%
1M
-20.02%
YTD
-43.12%
6M
-49.50%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CMDY

1D
-1.01%
1M
-3.07%
YTD
24.16%
6M
23.07%
1Y
35.71%
3Y*
15.11%
5Y*
10.49%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SOEZ vs. CMDY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
SOEZ
Franklin Solana ETF
-43.12%-11.97%
CMDY
iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF
24.16%-0.72%

Correlation

The correlation between SOEZ and CMDY is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2025

-0.13

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SOEZ vs. CMDY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SOEZ

CMDY
CMDY Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
CMDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMDY Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
CMDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMDY Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SOEZ vs. CMDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Solana ETF (SOEZ) and iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF (CMDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SOEZ vs. CMDY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SOEZCMDYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-1.10

0.55

-1.65

Drawdowns

SOEZ vs. CMDY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SOEZ drawdown since its inception was -52.20%, which is greater than CMDY's maximum drawdown of -31.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOEZ and CMDY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SOEZCMDYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.20%

-31.19%

-21.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-52.20%

-4.95%

-47.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.97%

-13.14%

-17.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.58%

Volatility

SOEZ vs. CMDY - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SOEZCMDYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

68.82%

16.10%

+52.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

68.82%

15.80%

+53.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

68.82%

14.63%

+54.19%

SOEZ vs. CMDY - Expense Ratio Comparison

SOEZ has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than CMDY's 0.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

SOEZ vs. CMDY - Dividend Comparison

SOEZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%, less than CMDY's 10.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
CMDY
iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF
10.38%12.89%4.23%5.10%3.98%16.09%0.15%2.21%1.73%
SOEZ
Franklin Solana ETF
0.59%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SOEZ and CMDY have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SOEZ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SOEZ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for CMDY.

CMDY has the higher dividend yield at 10.38%, compared with 0.59% for SOEZ.

SOEZ is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while CMDY is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Franklin and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for SOEZ and 0.28% for CMDY.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SOEZ and CMDY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer