SOCL vs. SIL
SOCL (Global X Social Media ETF) and SIL (Global X Silver Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SOCL is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Solactive Social Media Index, while SIL is a Silver fund tracking the Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SOCL returned 9.37%/yr vs 10.69%/yr for SIL. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.65% expense ratio.
Performance
SOCL vs. SIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SOCL achieves a -14.38% return, which is significantly lower than SIL's 4.75% return. Over the past 10 years, SOCL has underperformed SIL with an annualized return of 9.37%, while SIL has yielded a comparatively higher 10.69% annualized return.
SOCL
- 1D
- -2.45%
- 1M
- 1.38%
- YTD
- -14.38%
- 6M
- -14.22%
- 1Y
- 0.20%
- 3Y*
- 9.38%
- 5Y*
- -6.44%
- 10Y*
- 9.37%
SIL
- 1D
- -4.96%
- 1M
- 0.68%
- YTD
- 4.75%
- 6M
- 15.66%
- 1Y
- 91.23%
- 3Y*
- 49.15%
- 5Y*
- 13.96%
- 10Y*
- 10.69%
SOCL vs. SIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SOCL Global X Social Media ETF | -14.38% | 31.04% | 5.08% | 31.08% | -42.23% | -12.84% | 78.35% | 25.74% | -16.39% | 54.65% |
SIL Global X Silver Miners ETF | 4.75% | 166.16% | 14.62% | 1.31% | -22.83% | -18.35% | 40.30% | 34.78% | -22.42% | 1.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between SOCL and SIL is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2011 | 0.27 |
SOCL vs. SIL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SOCL
SIL
Communication Services
-
Technology
-
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Communication Services
SOCL
SIL
-
Technology
SOCL
SIL
-
Consumer Defensive
SOCL
SIL
Industrials
SOCL
SIL
-
Consumer Cyclical
SOCL
SIL
-
Basic Materials
SOCL
-
SIL
Energy
SOCL
-
SIL
-
Financial Services
SOCL
-
SIL
-
Healthcare
SOCL
-
SIL
-
Real Estate
SOCL
-
SIL
-
Utilities
SOCL
-
SIL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SOCL vs. SIL — Risk / Return Rank
SOCL
SIL
SOCL vs. SIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Social Media ETF (SOCL) and Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SOCL | SIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.30 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.01 | 2.79 | -2.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.01 | 7.14 | -7.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SOCL | SIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 | 1.83 | -1.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.22 | 0.36 | -0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 | 0.27 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 0.14 | +0.19 |
Drawdowns
SOCL vs. SIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SOCL drawdown since its inception was -68.70%, smaller than the maximum SIL drawdown of -82.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOCL and SIL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SOCL | SIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.70% | -82.99% | +14.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.52% | -32.91% | -0.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.52% | -32.91% | -0.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -66.32% | -55.08% | -11.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -68.70% | -63.04% | -5.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -38.48% | -25.87% | -12.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.95% | -51.45% | +29.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.68% | 12.82% | +2.86% |
Volatility
SOCL vs. SIL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Social Media ETF (SOCL) is 6.88%, while Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) has a volatility of 17.66%. This indicates that SOCL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SOCL | SIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.88% | 17.66% | -10.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.76% | 41.57% | -23.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.24% | 50.01% | -26.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.68% | 39.21% | -9.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.55% | 39.60% | -12.05% |
SOCL vs. SIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SOCL and SIL have an expense ratio of 0.65%.
Dividends
SOCL vs. SIL - Dividend Comparison
SOCL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%, less than SIL's 1.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SIL Global X Silver Miners ETF | 1.13% | 1.18% | 2.40% | 0.59% | 0.48% | 1.59% | 1.92% | 1.53% | 1.21% | 0.02% | 3.34% | 0.38% |
SOCL Global X Social Media ETF | 0.50% | 0.43% | 0.25% | 0.61% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.49% | 0.18% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SOCL and SIL have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SIL has higher volatility (17.66%) compared to SOCL (6.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SOCL dropped -68.70% vs SIL's -82.99%.
On 10-year performance, SIL leads with 10.69% vs 9.37% for SOCL. Both ETFs have the same 0.65% expense ratio. On volatility, SOCL has been the lower-risk option at 6.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SIL has performed better with a 10.69% return vs 9.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SOCL and SIL have the same expense ratio: 0.65% per year.
SIL has the higher dividend yield at 1.13%, compared with 0.50% for SOCL.
SOCL is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SIL is Silver. SOCL tracks Solactive Social Media Index, while SIL tracks Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return Index.
SIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SOCL and SIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer