SOCL vs. QARP
SOCL (Global X Social Media ETF) and QARP (Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - SOCL tracks the Solactive Social Media Index while QARP tracks the Russell 1000 2Qual/Val 5% Capped Factor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SOCL returned -6.93%/yr vs 12.09%/yr for QARP. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SOCL charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for QARP.
Performance
SOCL vs. QARP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SOCL achieves a -15.34% return, which is significantly lower than QARP's 12.78% return.
SOCL
- 1D
- -0.62%
- 1M
- 1.79%
- 6M
- -17.84%
- YTD
- -15.34%
- 1Y
- -12.77%
- 3Y*
- 5.60%
- 5Y*
- -6.93%
- 10Y*
- 8.36%
QARP
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- 1.10%
- 6M
- 9.34%
- YTD
- 12.78%
- 1Y
- 25.00%
- 3Y*
- 17.33%
- 5Y*
- 12.09%
- 10Y*
- —
SOCL vs. QARP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SOCL Global X Social Media ETF | -15.34% | 31.04% | 5.08% | 31.08% | -42.23% | -12.84% | 78.35% | 25.74% | -18.39% |
QARP Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF | 12.78% | 13.99% | 18.94% | 23.03% | -14.62% | 31.82% | 14.83% | 30.70% | -5.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between SOCL and QARP is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2018 | 0.63 |
The correlation between SOCL and QARP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.
SOCL vs. QARP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SOCL
QARP
Communication Services
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
SOCL
QARP
Technology
SOCL
QARP
Consumer Defensive
SOCL
QARP
Industrials
SOCL
QARP
Consumer Cyclical
SOCL
QARP
Basic Materials
SOCL
-
QARP
Energy
SOCL
-
QARP
Financial Services
SOCL
-
QARP
Healthcare
SOCL
-
QARP
Real Estate
SOCL
-
QARP
Utilities
SOCL
-
QARP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SOCL vs. QARP — Risk / Return Rank
SOCL
QARP
SOCL vs. QARP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Social Media ETF (SOCL) and Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SOCL | QARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.43 | -0.50 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.38 | 3.46 | -3.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.70 | 15.38 | -16.09 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SOCL vs. QARP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SOCL drawdown since its inception was -68.70%, which is greater than QARP's maximum drawdown of -35.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOCL and QARP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SOCL | QARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.70% | -35.44% | -33.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.52% | -7.26% | -26.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.52% | -15.65% | -17.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -65.10% | -22.75% | -42.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -68.70% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -39.17% | 0.00% | -39.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.10% | -4.39% | -17.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.23% | 1.63% | +16.60% |
Volatility
SOCL vs. QARP - Volatility Comparison
Global X Social Media ETF (SOCL) has a higher volatility of 8.07% compared to Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP) at 2.76%. This indicates that SOCL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QARP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SOCL | QARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.07% | 2.76% | +5.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.60% | 8.22% | +11.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.45% | 10.58% | +13.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.90% | 15.54% | +14.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.61% | 19.55% | +8.06% |
SOCL vs. QARP - Expense Ratio Comparison
SOCL has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than QARP's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
SOCL vs. QARP - Dividend Comparison
SOCL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, less than QARP's 1.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QARP Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF | 1.02% | 1.14% | 1.39% | 1.28% | 1.68% | 1.34% | 1.61% | 1.85% | 1.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SOCL Global X Social Media ETF | 0.46% | 0.43% | 0.25% | 0.61% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.49% | 0.18% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SOCL and QARP have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SOCL has higher volatility (8.07%) compared to QARP (2.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SOCL dropped -68.70% vs QARP's -35.44%.
On 5-year performance, QARP leads with 12.09% vs -6.93% for SOCL. On fees, QARP is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, QARP has been the lower-risk option at 2.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QARP has performed better with a 12.09% return vs -6.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QARP is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for SOCL.
QARP has the higher dividend yield at 1.02%, compared with 0.46% for SOCL.
SOCL tracks Solactive Social Media Index, while QARP tracks Russell 1000 2Qual/Val 5% Capped Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for SOCL and 0.19% for QARP.
QARP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs -0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SOCL and QARP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer