SOCL vs. DGRO
SOCL (Global X Social Media ETF) and DGRO (iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - SOCL tracks the Solactive Social Media Index while DGRO tracks the Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SOCL returned 7.96%/yr vs 13.64%/yr for DGRO. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SOCL charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for DGRO.
Performance
SOCL vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SOCL achieves a -23.22% return, which is significantly lower than DGRO's 9.37% return. Over the past 10 years, SOCL has underperformed DGRO with an annualized return of 7.96%, while DGRO has yielded a comparatively higher 13.64% annualized return.
SOCL
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- -4.36%
- YTD
- -23.22%
- 6M
- -22.97%
- 1Y
- -20.93%
- 3Y*
- 5.38%
- 5Y*
- -9.67%
- 10Y*
- 7.96%
DGRO
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 0.96%
- YTD
- 9.37%
- 6M
- 8.18%
- 1Y
- 21.50%
- 3Y*
- 16.99%
- 5Y*
- 10.89%
- 10Y*
- 13.64%
SOCL vs. DGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SOCL Global X Social Media ETF | -23.22% | 31.04% | 5.08% | 31.08% | -42.23% | -12.84% | 78.35% | 25.74% | -16.39% | 54.65% |
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 9.37% | 15.69% | 16.62% | 10.47% | -7.91% | 26.64% | 9.50% | 29.87% | -2.38% | 23.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between SOCL and DGRO is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2014 | 0.51 |
Over the past year, the correlation between SOCL and DGRO has dropped to 0.30 - well below their long-term average of 0.51, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
SOCL vs. DGRO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SOCL
DGRO
Communication Services
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
SOCL
DGRO
Technology
SOCL
DGRO
Consumer Defensive
SOCL
DGRO
Industrials
SOCL
DGRO
Consumer Cyclical
SOCL
DGRO
Basic Materials
SOCL
-
DGRO
Energy
SOCL
-
DGRO
Financial Services
SOCL
-
DGRO
Healthcare
SOCL
-
DGRO
Real Estate
SOCL
-
DGRO
-
Utilities
SOCL
-
DGRO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SOCL vs. DGRO — Risk / Return Rank
SOCL
DGRO
SOCL vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Social Media ETF (SOCL) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SOCL | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 1.41 | -0.54 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.63 | 3.34 | -3.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.24 | 12.88 | -14.12 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SOCL vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SOCL drawdown since its inception was -68.70%, which is greater than DGRO's maximum drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOCL and DGRO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SOCL | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.70% | -35.10% | -33.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.52% | -6.47% | -27.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.52% | -14.03% | -19.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -66.32% | -19.31% | -47.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -68.70% | -35.10% | -33.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -44.84% | -0.74% | -44.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.03% | -3.43% | -18.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.95% | 1.67% | +15.28% |
Volatility
SOCL vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison
Global X Social Media ETF (SOCL) has a higher volatility of 9.71% compared to iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) at 2.48%. This indicates that SOCL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SOCL | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.71% | 2.48% | +7.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.15% | 6.94% | +12.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.03% | 9.51% | +14.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.84% | 13.79% | +16.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.60% | 16.59% | +11.01% |
SOCL vs. DGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison
SOCL has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRO's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
SOCL vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison
SOCL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, less than DGRO's 1.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 1.96% | 2.09% | 2.26% | 2.45% | 2.34% | 1.93% | 2.30% | 2.21% | 2.44% | 2.03% | 2.27% | 2.52% |
SOCL Global X Social Media ETF | 0.56% | 0.43% | 0.25% | 0.61% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.49% | 0.18% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SOCL and DGRO have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SOCL has higher volatility (9.71%) compared to DGRO (2.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SOCL dropped -68.70% vs DGRO's -35.10%.
On 10-year performance, DGRO leads with 13.64% vs 7.96% for SOCL. On fees, DGRO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, DGRO has been the lower-risk option at 2.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, DGRO has performed better with a 13.64% return vs 7.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DGRO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for SOCL.
DGRO has the higher dividend yield at 1.96%, compared with 0.56% for SOCL.
SOCL tracks Solactive Social Media Index, while DGRO tracks Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for SOCL and 0.08% for DGRO.
DGRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs -0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SOCL and DGRO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer