SOC vs. CNTA
SOC (Sable Offshore Corp) and CNTA (Centessa Pharmaceuticals Limited) are both stocks. SOC operates in Oil & Gas Drilling (Energy), while CNTA operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare). Over the past year, SOC returned -46.45% vs 233.05% for CNTA. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SOC vs. CNTA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SOC achieves a 45.45% return, which is significantly lower than CNTA's 58.74% return.
SOC
- 1D
- 7.10%
- 1M
- 2.10%
- YTD
- 45.45%
- 6M
- 133.87%
- 1Y
- -46.45%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CNTA
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- 58.74%
- 6M
- 34.58%
- 1Y
- 233.05%
- 3Y*
- 104.97%
- 5Y*
- 12.71%
- 10Y*
- —
SOC vs. CNTA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
SOC Sable Offshore Corp | 45.45% | -60.61% | 84.53% |
CNTA Centessa Pharmaceuticals Limited | 58.74% | 49.31% | 54.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between SOC and CNTA is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2024 | 0.01 |
Fundamentals
SOC:
-$0.01
CNTA:
-$1.81
SOC:
371.49K
CNTA:
354.44
SOC:
$1.27M
CNTA:
$15.00M
SOC:
-$11.08M
CNTA:
$15.00M
SOC:
-$337.95M
CNTA:
-$227.27M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SOC vs. CNTA — Risk / Return Rank
SOC
CNTA
SOC vs. CNTA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sable Offshore Corp (SOC) and Centessa Pharmaceuticals Limited (CNTA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SOC | CNTA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.69 | -0.65 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.54 | 8.90 | -9.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.85 | 24.63 | -25.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SOC | CNTA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.33 | 3.54 | -3.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.18 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.02 | 0.18 | -0.15 |
Drawdowns
SOC vs. CNTA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SOC drawdown since its inception was -87.52%, roughly equal to the maximum CNTA drawdown of -88.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOC and CNTA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SOC | CNTA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.52% | -88.19% | +0.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -87.00% | -26.38% | -60.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -43.72% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -88.19% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -60.27% | -0.50% | -59.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.80% | -51.99% | +21.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 54.76% | 9.51% | +45.25% |
Volatility
SOC vs. CNTA - Volatility Comparison
Sable Offshore Corp (SOC) has a higher volatility of 27.48% compared to Centessa Pharmaceuticals Limited (CNTA) at 0.72%. This indicates that SOC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CNTA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SOC | CNTA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 27.48% | 0.72% | +26.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 96.35% | 44.27% | +52.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 140.85% | 66.48% | +74.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 111.43% | 72.09% | +39.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 111.43% | 72.30% | +39.13% |
Dividends
SOC vs. CNTA - Dividend Comparison
Neither SOC nor CNTA has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
SOC vs. CNTA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sable Offshore Corp and Centessa Pharmaceuticals Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
SOC and CNTA have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SOC has higher volatility (27.48%) compared to CNTA (0.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SOC dropped -87.52% vs CNTA's -88.19%.
CNTA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.54 vs -0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SOC and CNTA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer