SNXX vs. AUSF
SNXX (Tradr 2X Long SNDK Daily ETF) and AUSF (Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SNXX is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Tradr, while AUSF is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Adaptive Wealth Strategies U.S. Factor Index. SNXX is actively managed, while AUSF is passively managed. Their -0.19 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. SNXX charges 1.49%/yr vs 0.27%/yr for AUSF.
Performance
SNXX vs. AUSF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SNXX
- 1D
- -10.88%
- 1M
- -60.92%
- 6M
- 102.16%
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
AUSF
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- 3.29%
- 6M
- 7.58%
- YTD
- 12.60%
- 1Y
- 20.12%
- 3Y*
- 19.13%
- 5Y*
- 14.47%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 12.70%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.36M | $2.26M | $3.95M | |
| $1.51B | $1.59B | $1.43B |
SNXX vs. AUSF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SNXX Tradr 2X Long SNDK Daily ETF | 184.54% |
AUSF Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF | 8.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between SNXX and AUSF is -0.19, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2026 | -0.19 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SNXX vs. AUSF — Risk / Return Rank
SNXX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
AUSF
SNXX vs. AUSF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long SNDK Daily ETF (SNXX) and Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF (AUSF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SNXX | AUSF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.32 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.27 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 9.56 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SNXX vs. AUSF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SNXX drawdown since its inception was -85.09%, which is greater than AUSF's maximum drawdown of -44.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNXX and AUSF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SNXX | AUSF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.09% | -44.25% | -40.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.84% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -12.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -14.23% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -79.82% | -1.62% | -78.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.82% | -4.16% | -18.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.99% | — |
Volatility
SNXX vs. AUSF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SNXX | AUSF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.73% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.46% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 237.71% | 10.46% | +227.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 237.71% | 13.62% | +224.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 237.71% | 18.96% | +218.75% |
SNXX vs. AUSF - Expense Ratio Comparison
SNXX has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than AUSF's 0.27% expense ratio.
Dividends
SNXX vs. AUSF - Dividend Comparison
SNXX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AUSF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AUSF Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF | 2.61% | 2.78% | 2.63% | 1.83% | 2.51% | 2.22% | 2.95% | 4.02% | 1.46% |
SNXX Tradr 2X Long SNDK Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SNXX and AUSF have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AUSF is cheaper at 0.27% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AUSF is cheaper with a 0.27% expense ratio, compared with 1.49% for SNXX.
AUSF has the higher dividend yield at 2.61%, compared with 0.00% for SNXX.
SNXX is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while AUSF is Mid Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Tradr and Global X. Their fees differ too: 1.49% for SNXX and 0.27% for AUSF.
Find the right allocation for SNXX and AUSF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer