SNXFX vs. SWLSX
SNXFX (Schwab 1000 Index Fund) and SWLSX (Schwab Large-Cap Growth Fund™) are both mutual funds - SNXFX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Schwab 1000 Index, while SWLSX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Charles Schwab. Over the past 10 years, SNXFX returned 15.29%/yr vs 16.76%/yr for SWLSX. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SNXFX charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for SWLSX.
Performance
SNXFX vs. SWLSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SNXFX achieves a 11.89% return, which is significantly higher than SWLSX's 11.17% return. Over the past 10 years, SNXFX has underperformed SWLSX with an annualized return of 15.29%, while SWLSX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.76% annualized return.
SNXFX
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- 5.85%
- YTD
- 11.89%
- 6M
- 11.81%
- 1Y
- 28.65%
- 3Y*
- 22.58%
- 5Y*
- 13.51%
- 10Y*
- 15.29%
SWLSX
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 7.06%
- YTD
- 11.17%
- 6M
- 10.00%
- 1Y
- 29.73%
- 3Y*
- 24.86%
- 5Y*
- 16.18%
- 10Y*
- 16.76%
SNXFX vs. SWLSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SNXFX Schwab 1000 Index Fund | 11.89% | 17.23% | 24.46% | 26.53% | -19.46% | 26.10% | 20.71% | 31.43% | -5.04% | 21.71% |
SWLSX Schwab Large-Cap Growth Fund™ | 11.17% | 19.69% | 29.41% | 38.27% | -27.00% | 29.03% | 29.03% | 31.02% | -7.93% | 29.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between SNXFX and SWLSX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2006 | 0.95 |
The correlation between SNXFX and SWLSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
SNXFX vs. SWLSX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SNXFX
SWLSX
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
SNXFX
SWLSX
Financial Services
SNXFX
SWLSX
Communication Services
SNXFX
SWLSX
Consumer Cyclical
SNXFX
SWLSX
Industrials
SNXFX
SWLSX
Healthcare
SNXFX
SWLSX
Consumer Defensive
SNXFX
SWLSX
Energy
SNXFX
SWLSX
Utilities
SNXFX
SWLSX
-
Real Estate
SNXFX
SWLSX
-
Basic Materials
SNXFX
SWLSX
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SNXFX vs. SWLSX — Risk / Return Rank
SNXFX
SWLSX
SNXFX vs. SWLSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab 1000 Index Fund (SNXFX) and Schwab Large-Cap Growth Fund™ (SWLSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SNXFX | SWLSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.33 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.31 | 1.90 | +1.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.28 | 6.56 | +8.72 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SNXFX | SWLSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.44 | 1.92 | +0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 | 0.77 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.82 | 0.81 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.57 | +0.01 |
Drawdowns
SNXFX vs. SWLSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SNXFX drawdown since its inception was -55.08%, which is greater than SWLSX's maximum drawdown of -49.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNXFX and SWLSX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SNXFX | SWLSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.08% | -49.89% | -5.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.94% | -16.17% | +7.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.21% | -22.93% | +3.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.36% | -31.32% | +5.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.58% | -31.32% | -3.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.76% | -7.94% | -0.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.93% | 4.67% | -2.74% |
Volatility
SNXFX vs. SWLSX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab 1000 Index Fund (SNXFX) is 2.87%, while Schwab Large-Cap Growth Fund™ (SWLSX) has a volatility of 3.46%. This indicates that SNXFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SWLSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SNXFX | SWLSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.87% | 3.46% | -0.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.13% | 12.26% | -3.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.12% | 16.02% | -3.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.31% | 21.04% | -3.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.73% | 20.84% | -2.11% |
SNXFX vs. SWLSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SNXFX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than SWLSX's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
SNXFX vs. SWLSX - Dividend Comparison
SNXFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%, more than SWLSX's 1.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SNXFX Schwab 1000 Index Fund | 1.30% | 1.45% | 1.23% | 1.41% | 1.61% | 1.74% | 2.76% | 3.01% | 6.49% | 4.23% | 3.41% | 6.31% |
SWLSX Schwab Large-Cap Growth Fund™ | 1.05% | 1.17% | 0.11% | 0.04% | 2.07% | 7.77% | 1.07% | 5.32% | 12.35% | 7.92% | 4.46% | 17.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, SNXFX and SWLSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SWLSX has higher volatility (3.46%) compared to SNXFX (2.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNXFX dropped -55.08% vs SWLSX's -49.89%.
SNXFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SNXFX and SWLSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer