PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SNXFX vs. SPMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SNXFX vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab 1000 Index Fund (SNXFX) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SNXFX achieves a 11.89% return, which is significantly lower than SPMO's 30.35% return. Over the past 10 years, SNXFX has underperformed SPMO with an annualized return of 15.29%, while SPMO has yielded a comparatively higher 20.95% annualized return.


SNXFX

1D
0.25%
1M
5.85%
YTD
11.89%
6M
11.81%
1Y
28.65%
3Y*
22.58%
5Y*
13.51%
10Y*
15.29%

SPMO

1D
0.50%
1M
15.36%
YTD
30.35%
6M
30.51%
1Y
46.00%
3Y*
43.04%
5Y*
24.29%
10Y*
20.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SNXFX vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SNXFX
Schwab 1000 Index Fund
11.89%17.23%24.46%26.53%-19.46%26.10%20.71%31.43%-5.04%21.71%
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
30.35%26.58%45.82%17.56%-10.45%22.64%28.25%25.93%-0.92%27.76%

Correlation

The correlation between SNXFX and SPMO is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2015

0.78

The correlation between SNXFX and SPMO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

SNXFX vs. SPMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SNXFX
SPMO

Technology

34.6%
52.6%

Financial Services

11.9%
5.9%

Communication Services

10.6%
9.2%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
1.3%

Industrials

9.4%
11.3%

Healthcare

8.7%
6.7%

Consumer Defensive

4.7%
4.3%

Energy

3.6%
3.4%

Utilities

2.3%
2.8%

Real Estate

2.2%
1.0%

Basic Materials

2.0%
1.6%

Technology

SNXFX
34.6%
SPMO
52.6%

Financial Services

SNXFX
11.9%
SPMO
5.9%

Communication Services

SNXFX
10.6%
SPMO
9.2%

Consumer Cyclical

SNXFX
10.1%
SPMO
1.3%

Industrials

SNXFX
9.4%
SPMO
11.3%

Healthcare

SNXFX
8.7%
SPMO
6.7%

Consumer Defensive

SNXFX
4.7%
SPMO
4.3%

Energy

SNXFX
3.6%
SPMO
3.4%

Utilities

SNXFX
2.3%
SPMO
2.8%

Real Estate

SNXFX
2.2%
SPMO
1.0%

Basic Materials

SNXFX
2.0%
SPMO
1.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SNXFX vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SNXFX
SNXFX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
SNXFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SNXFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
SNXFX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
SNXFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
SNXFX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

SPMO
SPMO Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
SPMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPMO Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
SPMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPMO Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SNXFX vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab 1000 Index Fund (SNXFX) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SNXFXSPMODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.47

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.31

3.64

-0.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.28

14.17

+1.11

SNXFX vs. SPMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SNXFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.44, which is comparable to the SPMO Sharpe Ratio of 2.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SNXFX and SPMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SNXFXSPMODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.44

2.62

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

1.27

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

1.03

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

1.01

-0.43

Drawdowns

SNXFX vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNXFX drawdown since its inception was -55.08%, which is greater than SPMO's maximum drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNXFX and SPMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SNXFXSPMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.08%

-30.95%

-24.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.94%

-12.70%

+3.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.21%

-20.13%

+0.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.36%

-22.74%

-2.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.58%

-30.95%

-3.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.76%

-4.60%

-4.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.93%

3.26%

-1.33%

Volatility

SNXFX vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab 1000 Index Fund (SNXFX) is 2.87%, while Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) has a volatility of 7.35%. This indicates that SNXFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SNXFXSPMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.87%

7.35%

-4.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.13%

14.39%

-5.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.12%

17.64%

-5.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.31%

19.30%

-1.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.73%

20.31%

-1.58%

SNXFX vs. SPMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

SNXFX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than SPMO's 0.13% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SNXFX vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison

SNXFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%, more than SPMO's 0.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SNXFX
Schwab 1000 Index Fund
1.30%1.45%1.23%1.41%1.61%1.74%2.76%3.01%6.49%4.23%3.41%6.31%
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
0.65%0.73%0.48%1.63%1.66%0.52%1.27%1.39%1.05%0.77%1.94%0.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


SNXFX and SPMO have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPMO has higher volatility (7.35%) compared to SNXFX (2.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNXFX dropped -55.08% vs SPMO's -30.95%.

SPMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 2.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SNXFX and SPMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer