PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SNTCX vs. TBGVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SNTCX vs. TBGVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Crossmark Steward International Enhanced Index Fund (SNTCX) and Tweedy, Browne International Value Fund (TBGVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SNTCX achieves a 11.27% return, which is significantly higher than TBGVX's 9.94% return. Over the past 10 years, SNTCX has outperformed TBGVX with an annualized return of 10.16%, while TBGVX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.92% annualized return.


SNTCX

1D
-0.98%
1M
3.98%
YTD
11.27%
6M
12.56%
1Y
28.34%
3Y*
20.63%
5Y*
9.94%
10Y*
10.16%

TBGVX

1D
-0.06%
1M
4.06%
YTD
9.94%
6M
11.25%
1Y
17.93%
3Y*
13.54%
5Y*
8.11%
10Y*
7.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SNTCX vs. TBGVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SNTCX
Crossmark Steward International Enhanced Index Fund
11.27%33.58%8.58%17.60%-11.61%10.82%4.89%18.97%-13.17%23.33%
TBGVX
Tweedy, Browne International Value Fund
9.94%23.86%2.47%12.48%-7.52%15.62%-1.00%14.64%-6.72%15.03%

Correlation

The correlation between SNTCX and TBGVX is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2006

0.72

The correlation between SNTCX and TBGVX shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (1 year) to 0.75 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SNTCX vs. TBGVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SNTCX
SNTCX Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
SNTCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SNTCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
SNTCX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
SNTCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
SNTCX Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

TBGVX
TBGVX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
TBGVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TBGVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
TBGVX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
TBGVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
TBGVX Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SNTCX vs. TBGVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Crossmark Steward International Enhanced Index Fund (SNTCX) and Tweedy, Browne International Value Fund (TBGVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SNTCXTBGVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.37

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.69

2.00

+0.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.12

6.43

+3.70

SNTCX vs. TBGVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SNTCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is comparable to the TBGVX Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SNTCX and TBGVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SNTCXTBGVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.92

1.99

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

0.73

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

0.63

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

0.75

-0.52

Drawdowns

SNTCX vs. TBGVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNTCX drawdown since its inception was -60.58%, which is greater than TBGVX's maximum drawdown of -50.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNTCX and TBGVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SNTCXTBGVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.58%

-50.97%

-9.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.60%

-9.56%

-1.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.26%

-11.45%

-3.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.08%

-17.71%

-9.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.33%

-31.18%

-8.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.98%

-1.65%

+0.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.09%

-6.08%

-10.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.82%

2.96%

-0.14%

Volatility

SNTCX vs. TBGVX - Volatility Comparison

Crossmark Steward International Enhanced Index Fund (SNTCX) has a higher volatility of 4.94% compared to Tweedy, Browne International Value Fund (TBGVX) at 2.67%. This indicates that SNTCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TBGVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SNTCXTBGVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.94%

2.67%

+2.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.48%

7.78%

+4.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.90%

9.61%

+5.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.33%

11.11%

+6.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.26%

12.67%

+5.59%

SNTCX vs. TBGVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SNTCX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is lower than TBGVX's 1.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

SNTCX vs. TBGVX - Dividend Comparison

SNTCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.07%, less than TBGVX's 11.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SNTCX
Crossmark Steward International Enhanced Index Fund
7.07%7.86%18.31%4.23%3.17%4.75%3.96%2.59%2.47%2.27%2.29%4.38%
TBGVX
Tweedy, Browne International Value Fund
11.02%12.11%9.95%4.55%5.68%8.89%0.94%1.88%6.74%1.10%3.16%4.94%

Frequently Asked Questions


SNTCX and TBGVX have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SNTCX has higher volatility (4.94%) compared to TBGVX (2.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNTCX dropped -60.58% vs TBGVX's -50.97%.

TBGVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SNTCX and TBGVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer