PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SNPG vs. SPXD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SNPG vs. SPXD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers S&P 500 Growth ESG ETF (SNPG) and Xtrackers S&P 500 Diversified Sector Weight ETF (SPXD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SNPG achieves a 8.25% return, which is significantly lower than SPXD's 12.74% return.


SNPG

1D
0.79%
1M
-2.92%
6M
8.74%
YTD
8.25%
1Y
19.28%
3Y*
21.47%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
26.75%

SPXD

1D
0.00%
1M
0.53%
6M
9.22%
YTD
12.74%
1Y
21.28%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
17.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$89.94K$76.62K$58.56K
$5.42K$11.85K$21.80K

SNPG vs. SPXD - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SNPG and SPXD is 0.52, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025

0.51

The correlation between SNPG and SPXD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SNPG vs. SPXD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SNPG
SNPG Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
SNPG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SNPG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
SNPG Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
SNPG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
SNPG Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

SPXD
SPXD Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
SPXD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPXD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPXD Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
SPXD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPXD Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SNPG vs. SPXD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P 500 Growth ESG ETF (SNPG) and Xtrackers S&P 500 Diversified Sector Weight ETF (SPXD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SNPGSPXDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.34

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.35

2.71

-1.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.78

10.92

-6.14

SNPG vs. SPXD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SNPG Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is lower than the SPXD Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SNPG and SPXD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SNPG vs. SPXD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNPG drawdown since its inception was -21.69%, which is greater than SPXD's maximum drawdown of -7.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNPG and SPXD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SNPGSPXDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.69%

-7.53%

-14.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.12%

-7.53%

-5.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.69%

-0.88%

-5.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.60%

-1.14%

-1.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.69%

1.87%

+1.82%

Volatility

SNPG vs. SPXD - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers S&P 500 Growth ESG ETF (SNPG) has a higher volatility of 6.72% compared to Xtrackers S&P 500 Diversified Sector Weight ETF (SPXD) at 2.73%. This indicates that SNPG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPXD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SNPGSPXDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.72%

2.73%

+3.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.13%

7.88%

+7.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.26%

10.71%

+6.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.48%

10.64%

+7.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.48%

10.64%

+7.84%

SNPG vs. SPXD - Expense Ratio Comparison

SNPG has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SPXD's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SNPG vs. SPXD - Dividend Comparison

SNPG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%, less than SPXD's 1.38% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
SNPG
Xtrackers S&P 500 Growth ESG ETF
0.48%0.49%0.57%0.95%0.20%
SPXD
Xtrackers S&P 500 Diversified Sector Weight ETF
1.38%0.76%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SNPG and SPXD have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SNPG has higher volatility (6.72%) compared to SPXD (2.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNPG dropped -21.69% vs SPXD's -7.53%.

On 1-year performance, SPXD leads with 21.28% vs 19.28% for SNPG. On fees, SPXD is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SPXD has been the lower-risk option at 2.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SPXD has performed better with a 21.28% return vs 19.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPXD is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for SNPG.

SPXD has the higher dividend yield at 1.38%, compared with 0.48% for SNPG.

SNPG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SPXD is Large Cap Value Equities. SNPG tracks S&P 500 Growth ESG Index, while SPXD tracks S&P 500 Diversified Sector Weight Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SNPG and 0.09% for SPXD.

SPXD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SNPG and SPXD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer