SNPG vs. SPXD
SNPG (Xtrackers S&P 500 Growth ESG ETF) and SPXD (Xtrackers S&P 500 Diversified Sector Weight ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SNPG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Growth ESG Index, while SPXD is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Diversified Sector Weight Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SNPG charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SPXD.
Performance
SNPG vs. SPXD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SNPG having a 10.54% return and SPXD slightly lower at 10.06%.
SNPG
- 1D
- -3.01%
- 1M
- 3.72%
- YTD
- 10.54%
- 6M
- 9.70%
- 1Y
- 28.74%
- 3Y*
- 24.34%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPXD
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 0.99%
- YTD
- 10.06%
- 6M
- 9.55%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SNPG vs. SPXD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SNPG Xtrackers S&P 500 Growth ESG ETF | 10.54% | 9.59% |
SPXD Xtrackers S&P 500 Diversified Sector Weight ETF | 10.06% | 4.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between SNPG and SPXD is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025 | 0.59 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SNPG vs. SPXD — Risk / Return Rank
SNPG
SPXD
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SNPG vs. SPXD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P 500 Growth ESG ETF (SNPG) and Xtrackers S&P 500 Diversified Sector Weight ETF (SPXD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SNPG | SPXD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.20 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.04 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SNPG vs. SPXD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SNPG drawdown since its inception was -21.69%, which is greater than SPXD's maximum drawdown of -7.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNPG and SPXD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SNPG | SPXD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.69% | -7.53% | -14.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.12% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.69% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.01% | -1.22% | -1.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.52% | -1.21% | -1.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.19% | — | — |
Volatility
SNPG vs. SPXD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SNPG | SPXD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.75% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.35% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.52% | 10.88% | +4.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.26% | 10.88% | +7.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.26% | 10.88% | +7.38% |
SNPG vs. SPXD - Expense Ratio Comparison
SNPG has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SPXD's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SNPG vs. SPXD - Dividend Comparison
SNPG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.47%, less than SPXD's 1.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SNPG Xtrackers S&P 500 Growth ESG ETF | 0.47% | 0.49% | 0.57% | 0.95% | 0.20% |
SPXD Xtrackers S&P 500 Diversified Sector Weight ETF | 1.41% | 0.76% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SNPG and SPXD have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPXD is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPXD is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for SNPG.
SPXD has the higher dividend yield at 1.41%, compared with 0.47% for SNPG.
SNPG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SPXD is Large Cap Value Equities. SNPG tracks S&P 500 Growth ESG Index, while SPXD tracks S&P 500 Diversified Sector Weight Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SNPG and 0.09% for SPXD.
Find the right allocation for SNPG and SPXD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer