SNPG vs. SGRT

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

SNPG (Xtrackers S&P 500 Growth ESG ETF) and SGRT (SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. SNPG is passively managed, while SGRT is actively managed. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SNPG charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for SGRT.

Performance

SNPG vs. SGRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers S&P 500 Growth ESG ETF (SNPG) and SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF (SGRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SNPG achieves a 11.36% return, which is significantly lower than SGRT's 48.90% return.

SNPG

• 1D: 0.56%
• 1M: 9.28%
• YTD: 11.36%
• 6M: 11.71%
• 1Y: 29.68%
• 3Y*: 25.37%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SGRT

• 1D: -1.69%
• 1M: 9.59%
• YTD: 48.90%
• 6M: 51.74%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SNPG vs. SGRT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SNPG Xtrackers S&P 500 Growth ESG ETF	11.36%	8.09%
SGRT SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF	48.90%	25.25%

Correlation

The correlation between SNPG and SGRT is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2025	0.65

Return for Risk

SNPG vs. SGRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SNPG

SNPG Risk / Return Rank: 59
SNPG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
SNPG Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
SNPG Omega Ratio Rank: 62
SNPG Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
SNPG Martin Ratio Rank: 55

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SNPG vs. SGRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P 500 Growth ESG ETF (SNPG) and SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF (SGRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SNPG	SGRT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.12	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.02	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.27	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.43	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SNPG	SGRT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.12	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.63	3.63	-2.00

Drawdowns

SNPG vs. SGRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNPG drawdown since its inception was -21.69%, which is greater than SGRT's maximum drawdown of -17.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNPG and SGRT.

Drawdown Indicators

	SNPG	SGRT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.69%	-17.87%	-3.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.12%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.69%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.69%	+1.69%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.53%	-3.10%	+0.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.15%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SNPG	SGRT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.71%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.43%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.05%	33.40%	-19.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.00%	33.40%	-15.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.00%	33.40%	-15.40%

SNPG vs. SGRT - Expense Ratio Comparison

SNPG has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than SGRT's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

SNPG vs. SGRT - Dividend Comparison

SNPG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, more than SGRT's 0.11% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
SGRT SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF	0.11%	0.16%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SNPG Xtrackers S&P 500 Growth ESG ETF	0.46%	0.49%	0.57%	0.95%	0.20%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SNPG and SGRT in my portfolio?

SNPG and SGRT have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SNPG or SGRT?

On fees, SNPG is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SNPG or SGRT?

SNPG is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for SGRT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SNPG or SGRT?

SNPG has the higher dividend yield at 0.46%, compared with 0.11% for SGRT.

What is the main difference between SNPG and SGRT?

Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SNPG and 0.59% for SGRT.