SNPG vs. CA

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

SNPG (Xtrackers S&P 500 Growth ESG ETF) and CA (Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SNPG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Growth ESG Index, while CA is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the ICE AMT-Free Broad Liquid California Municipal Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, SNPG returned 29.68% vs 6.26% for CA. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SNPG charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for CA.

Performance

SNPG vs. CA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers S&P 500 Growth ESG ETF (SNPG) and Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF (CA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SNPG achieves a 11.36% return, which is significantly higher than CA's 1.20% return.

SNPG

• 1D: 0.56%
• 1M: 9.28%
• YTD: 11.36%
• 6M: 11.71%
• 1Y: 29.68%
• 3Y*: 25.37%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CA

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.28%
• YTD: 1.20%
• 6M: 1.48%
• 1Y: 6.26%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SNPG vs. CA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
SNPG Xtrackers S&P 500 Growth ESG ETF	11.36%	18.22%	33.99%	1.39%
CA Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF	1.20%	3.05%	1.51%	0.79%

Correlation

The correlation between SNPG and CA is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.17
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2023	0.14

Return for Risk

SNPG vs. CA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SNPG

SNPG Risk / Return Rank: 59
SNPG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
SNPG Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
SNPG Omega Ratio Rank: 62
SNPG Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
SNPG Martin Ratio Rank: 55

CA

CA Risk / Return Rank: 70
CA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
CA Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
CA Omega Ratio Rank: 89
CA Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
CA Martin Ratio Rank: 54

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SNPG vs. CA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P 500 Growth ESG ETF (SNPG) and Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF (CA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SNPG	CA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.12	2.41	-0.29
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.02	3.60	-0.58
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.55	-0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.27	2.45	-0.17
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.43	9.22	+0.22
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SNPG vs. CA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SNPG Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is comparable to the CA Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SNPG and CA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SNPG	CA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.12	2.41	-0.29
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.63	0.67	+0.96

Drawdowns

SNPG vs. CA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNPG drawdown since its inception was -21.69%, which is greater than CA's maximum drawdown of -5.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNPG and CA.

Drawdown Indicators

	SNPG	CA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.69%	-5.24%	-16.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.12%	-2.57%	-10.55%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.69%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.75%	+0.75%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.53%	-1.27%	-1.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.15%	0.68%	+2.47%

Volatility

SNPG vs. CA - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers S&P 500 Growth ESG ETF (SNPG) has a higher volatility of 4.71% compared to Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF (CA) at 0.30%. This indicates that SNPG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SNPG	CA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.71%	0.30%	+4.41%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.43%	1.82%	+9.61%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.05%	2.64%	+11.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.00%	3.98%	+14.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.00%	3.98%	+14.02%

SNPG vs. CA - Expense Ratio Comparison

SNPG has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than CA's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

SNPG vs. CA - Dividend Comparison

SNPG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, less than CA's 2.96% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
CA Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF	2.96%	3.14%	3.03%	0.00%	0.00%
SNPG Xtrackers S&P 500 Growth ESG ETF	0.46%	0.49%	0.57%	0.95%	0.20%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SNPG and CA in my portfolio?

SNPG and CA have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SNPG or CA?

SNPG has higher volatility (4.71%) compared to CA (0.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNPG dropped -21.69% vs CA's -5.24%.

Which ETF is better, SNPG or CA?

On 1-year performance, SNPG leads with 29.68% vs 6.26% for CA. On fees, CA is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, CA has been the lower-risk option at 0.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SNPG or CA?

Over the 1-year period, SNPG has performed better with a 29.68% return vs 6.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SNPG or CA?

CA is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for SNPG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SNPG or CA?

CA has the higher dividend yield at 2.96%, compared with 0.46% for SNPG.

What is the main difference between SNPG and CA?

SNPG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while CA is Municipal Bonds. SNPG tracks S&P 500 Growth ESG Index, while CA tracks ICE AMT-Free Broad Liquid California Municipal Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SNPG and 0.07% for CA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.