SNPE vs. RPG
SNPE (Xtrackers S&P 500 ESG ETF) and RPG (Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SNPE is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 ESG Index, while RPG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the S&P 500/Citigroup Pure Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SNPE returned 14.46%/yr vs 13.02%/yr for RPG. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SNPE charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for RPG.
Performance
SNPE vs. RPG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SNPE achieves a 9.73% return, which is significantly lower than RPG's 31.51% return.
SNPE
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- 4.56%
- YTD
- 9.73%
- 6M
- 10.34%
- 1Y
- 30.35%
- 3Y*
- 21.76%
- 5Y*
- 14.46%
- 10Y*
- —
RPG
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 11.54%
- YTD
- 31.51%
- 6M
- 32.14%
- 1Y
- 41.04%
- 3Y*
- 28.39%
- 5Y*
- 13.02%
- 10Y*
- 14.81%
SNPE vs. RPG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SNPE Xtrackers S&P 500 ESG ETF | 9.73% | 18.56% | 23.85% | 27.79% | -17.67% | 31.43% | 19.84% | 12.92% |
RPG Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF | 31.51% | 13.41% | 28.23% | 8.04% | -27.55% | 29.40% | 29.34% | 8.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between SNPE and RPG is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2019 | 0.87 |
The correlation between SNPE and RPG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
SNPE vs. RPG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SNPE
RPG
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Utilities
Technology
SNPE
RPG
Communication Services
SNPE
RPG
Financial Services
SNPE
RPG
Healthcare
SNPE
RPG
Industrials
SNPE
RPG
Consumer Defensive
SNPE
RPG
Consumer Cyclical
SNPE
RPG
Energy
SNPE
RPG
Real Estate
SNPE
RPG
Basic Materials
SNPE
RPG
Utilities
SNPE
RPG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SNPE vs. RPG — Risk / Return Rank
SNPE
RPG
SNPE vs. RPG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P 500 ESG ETF (SNPE) and Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF (RPG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SNPE | RPG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.54 | 2.09 | +0.44 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.54 | 2.82 | +0.73 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.36 | +0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.22 | 3.72 | -0.50 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.89 | 14.56 | +0.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SNPE | RPG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.54 | 2.09 | +0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 | 0.56 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.65 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.88 | 0.54 | +0.34 |
Drawdowns
SNPE vs. RPG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SNPE drawdown since its inception was -33.37%, smaller than the maximum RPG drawdown of -53.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNPE and RPG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SNPE | RPG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.37% | -53.27% | +19.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.46% | -11.08% | +1.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.15% | -24.75% | +5.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.65% | -35.59% | +10.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.58% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.17% | 0.00% | -1.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.96% | -8.84% | +3.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.04% | 2.83% | -0.79% |
Volatility
SNPE vs. RPG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers S&P 500 ESG ETF (SNPE) is 3.30%, while Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF (RPG) has a volatility of 6.43%. This indicates that SNPE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RPG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SNPE | RPG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.30% | 6.43% | -3.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.11% | 16.26% | -7.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.03% | 19.73% | -7.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.10% | 23.44% | -6.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.67% | 22.70% | -3.03% |
SNPE vs. RPG - Expense Ratio Comparison
SNPE has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than RPG's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
SNPE vs. RPG - Dividend Comparison
SNPE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, more than RPG's 0.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RPG Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF | 0.17% | 0.24% | 0.25% | 1.44% | 0.74% | 0.00% | 0.46% | 0.83% | 0.47% | 0.56% | 0.43% | 0.73% |
SNPE Xtrackers S&P 500 ESG ETF | 0.91% | 1.01% | 1.17% | 1.32% | 1.65% | 1.08% | 1.42% | 1.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SNPE and RPG have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RPG has higher volatility (6.43%) compared to SNPE (3.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNPE dropped -33.37% vs RPG's -53.27%.
On 5-year performance, SNPE leads with 14.46% vs 13.02% for RPG. On fees, SNPE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, SNPE has been the lower-risk option at 3.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SNPE has performed better with a 14.46% return vs 13.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SNPE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for RPG.
SNPE has the higher dividend yield at 0.91%, compared with 0.17% for RPG.
SNPE is categorized as S&P 500, while RPG is Large Cap Growth Equities. SNPE tracks S&P 500 ESG Index, while RPG tracks S&P 500/Citigroup Pure Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for SNPE and 0.35% for RPG.
SNPE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SNPE and RPG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer