SNPE vs. CN
SNPE (Xtrackers S&P 500 ESG ETF) and CN (Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SNPE is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 ESG Index, while CN is a China Equities fund tracking the MSCI China All Shares. Both are passively managed. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SNPE charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for CN.
Performance
SNPE vs. CN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SNPE
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- 4.92%
- YTD
- 10.55%
- 6M
- 11.45%
- 1Y
- 32.05%
- 3Y*
- 22.06%
- 5Y*
- 14.83%
- 10Y*
- —
CN
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SNPE vs. CN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SNPE Xtrackers S&P 500 ESG ETF | 10.55% | 18.56% | 23.85% | 27.79% | -17.67% | 31.43% | 19.84% | 12.92% |
CN Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | -3.10% | -11.87% | -23.85% | -12.74% | 31.55% | 8.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between SNPE and CN is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2019 | 0.41 |
The correlation between SNPE and CN shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (3 years) to 0.41 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SNPE vs. CN - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SNPE
CN
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Utilities
Technology
SNPE
CN
Communication Services
SNPE
CN
Financial Services
SNPE
CN
Healthcare
SNPE
CN
Industrials
SNPE
CN
Consumer Defensive
SNPE
CN
Consumer Cyclical
SNPE
CN
Energy
SNPE
CN
Real Estate
SNPE
CN
Basic Materials
SNPE
CN
Utilities
SNPE
CN
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SNPE vs. CN — Risk / Return Rank
SNPE
CN
SNPE vs. CN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P 500 ESG ETF (SNPE) and Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF (CN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SNPE | CN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.68 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.73 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.47 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.08 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SNPE | CN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.68 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.89 | — | — |
Drawdowns
SNPE vs. CN - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SNPE | CN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.37% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.46% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.15% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.65% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.43% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.96% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.04% | — | — |
Volatility
SNPE vs. CN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SNPE | CN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.21% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.07% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.01% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.09% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.67% | — | — |
SNPE vs. CN - Expense Ratio Comparison
SNPE has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than CN's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
SNPE vs. CN - Dividend Comparison
SNPE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, while CN has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CN Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.04% | 1.80% | 2.00% | 0.78% | 4.18% | 2.09% | 0.81% | 11.41% | 14.00% |
SNPE Xtrackers S&P 500 ESG ETF | 0.91% | 1.01% | 1.17% | 1.32% | 1.65% | 1.08% | 1.42% | 1.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SNPE and CN have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SNPE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SNPE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for CN.
SNPE has the higher dividend yield at 0.91%, compared with 0.00% for CN.
SNPE is categorized as S&P 500, while CN is China Equities. SNPE tracks S&P 500 ESG Index, while CN tracks MSCI China All Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for SNPE and 0.50% for CN.
Find the right allocation for SNPE and CN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer