SNPD vs. USCA

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

SNPD (Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF) and USCA (Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SNPD is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P ESG High Yield Dividend Aristocrats Index, while USCA is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Climate Action Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SNPD returned 9.37%/yr vs 18.72%/yr for USCA. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SNPD charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for USCA.

Performance

SNPD vs. USCA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF (SNPD) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF (USCA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SNPD achieves a 10.29% return, which is significantly higher than USCA's 3.65% return.

SNPD

• 1D: 0.35%
• 1M: 1.91%
• YTD: 10.29%
• 6M: 9.96%
• 1Y: 16.04%
• 3Y*: 9.37%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

USCA

• 1D: -1.13%
• 1M: -1.90%
• YTD: 3.65%
• 6M: 2.68%
• 1Y: 15.74%
• 3Y*: 18.72%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SNPD vs. USCA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
SNPD Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF	10.29%	6.66%	5.41%	3.83%
USCA Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF	3.65%	14.24%	27.24%	19.92%

Correlation

The correlation between SNPD and USCA is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.41
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.56
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2023	0.57

The correlation between SNPD and USCA shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (1 year) to 0.57 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SNPD vs. USCA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SNPD	USCA
Consumer Defensive	18.8%	4.0%
Industrials	16.9%	6.6%
Utilities	14.3%	1.7%
Consumer Cyclical	9.2%	10.5%
Financial Services	8.0%	8.9%
Technology	7.3%	41.9%
Basic Materials	7.2%	1.5%
Real Estate	6.8%	1.8%
Healthcare	5.0%	9.0%
Communication Services	3.4%	12.2%
Energy	3.1%	1.9%

Return for Risk

SNPD vs. USCA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SNPD

SNPD Risk / Return Rank: 41
SNPD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
SNPD Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
SNPD Omega Ratio Rank: 40
SNPD Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
SNPD Martin Ratio Rank: 37

USCA

USCA Risk / Return Rank: 36
USCA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
USCA Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
USCA Omega Ratio Rank: 36
USCA Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
USCA Martin Ratio Rank: 40

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SNPD vs. USCA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF (SNPD) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF (USCA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SNPD	USCA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.45	1.25	+0.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.18	1.76	+0.42
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.23	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.86	1.54	+0.31
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.51	5.91	-0.40

SNPD vs. USCA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SNPD Sharpe Ratio is 1.45, which is comparable to the USCA Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SNPD and USCA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SNPD vs. USCA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNPD drawdown since its inception was -15.80%, smaller than the maximum USCA drawdown of -19.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNPD and USCA.

Drawdown Indicators

	SNPD	USCA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.80%	-19.14%	+3.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.68%	-10.25%	+1.57%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.80%	-19.14%	+3.34%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.34%	-3.97%	+2.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.90%	-2.17%	-1.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.92%	2.67%	+0.25%

Volatility

SNPD vs. USCA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF (SNPD) is 3.10%, while Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF (USCA) has a volatility of 4.78%. This indicates that SNPD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USCA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SNPD	USCA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.10%	4.78%	-1.68%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.16%	9.87%	-1.71%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.13%	12.66%	-1.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.11%	14.85%	-1.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.11%	14.85%	-1.74%

SNPD vs. USCA - Expense Ratio Comparison

SNPD has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than USCA's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

SNPD vs. USCA - Dividend Comparison

SNPD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.29%, more than USCA's 1.15% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
SNPD Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF	3.29%	3.10%	2.78%	2.63%	0.57%
USCA Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF	1.15%	1.14%	1.22%	1.15%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SNPD and USCA in my portfolio?

SNPD and USCA have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SNPD or USCA?

USCA has higher volatility (4.78%) compared to SNPD (3.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNPD dropped -15.80% vs USCA's -19.14%.

Which ETF is better, SNPD or USCA?

On 3-year performance, USCA leads with 18.72% vs 9.37% for SNPD. On fees, USCA is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, SNPD has been the lower-risk option at 3.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SNPD or USCA?

Over the 3-year period, USCA has performed better with a 18.72% return vs 9.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SNPD or USCA?

USCA is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for SNPD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SNPD or USCA?

SNPD has the higher dividend yield at 3.29%, compared with 1.15% for USCA.

What is the main difference between SNPD and USCA?

SNPD is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while USCA is Large Cap Blend Equities. SNPD tracks S&P ESG High Yield Dividend Aristocrats Index, while USCA tracks MSCI USA Climate Action Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SNPD and 0.07% for USCA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SNPD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.45 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.