SNPD vs. DXUV

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

SNPD (Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF) and DXUV (Dimensional US Vector Equity ETF) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds. SNPD is passively managed, while DXUV is actively managed. Over the past year, SNPD returned 20.68% vs 28.06% for DXUV. Their 0.69 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. SNPD charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for DXUV.

Performance

SNPD vs. DXUV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF (SNPD) and Dimensional US Vector Equity ETF (DXUV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SNPD having a 15.68% return and DXUV slightly higher at 16.02%.

SNPD

• 1D: 0.56%
• 1M: 1.41%
• 6M: 7.94%
• YTD: 15.68%
• 1Y: 20.68%
• 3Y*: 9.43%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 9.06%

DXUV

• 1D: 1.52%
• 1M: 3.27%
• 6M: 11.12%
• YTD: 16.02%
• 1Y: 28.06%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 19.19%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
DXUV Dimensional US Vector Equity ETF	$5.68M	$4.16M	$3.52M
SNPD Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF	$13.15K	$33.91K	$29.19K

SNPD vs. DXUV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
SNPD Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF	15.68%	6.66%	-3.28%
DXUV Dimensional US Vector Equity ETF	16.02%	14.34%	5.03%

Correlation

The correlation between SNPD and DXUV is 0.61, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.61
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2024	0.69

The correlation between SNPD and DXUV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

SNPD vs. DXUV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SNPD	DXUV
Consumer Defensive	19.0%	5.3%
Industrials	17.7%	13.7%
Utilities	14.4%	0.5%
Consumer Cyclical	9.3%	10.8%
Financial Services	8.3%	17.7%
Basic Materials	6.8%	4.1%
Real Estate	6.8%	0.3%
Technology	6.5%	24.5%
Healthcare	5.2%	9.5%
Communication Services	3.0%	6.7%
Energy	2.9%	6.5%

Return for Risk

SNPD vs. DXUV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SNPD

SNPD Risk / Return Rank: 70
SNPD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
SNPD Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
SNPD Omega Ratio Rank: 70
SNPD Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
SNPD Martin Ratio Rank: 57

DXUV

DXUV Risk / Return Rank: 86
DXUV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
DXUV Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
DXUV Omega Ratio Rank: 85
DXUV Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
DXUV Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SNPD vs. DXUV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF (SNPD) and Dimensional US Vector Equity ETF (DXUV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SNPD	DXUV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.81	2.20	-0.39
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.70	3.07	-0.37
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.39	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.39	3.31	-0.91
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.14	13.52	-6.38

SNPD vs. DXUV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SNPD Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is comparable to the DXUV Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SNPD and DXUV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SNPD vs. DXUV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNPD drawdown since its inception was -15.80%, smaller than the maximum DXUV drawdown of -21.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNPD and DXUV.

Drawdown Indicators

	SNPD	DXUV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.80%	-21.08%	+5.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.68%	-8.53%	-0.15%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.80%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.11%	0.00%	-2.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.81%	-2.86%	-0.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.90%	2.08%	+0.82%

Volatility

SNPD vs. DXUV - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF (SNPD) has a higher volatility of 4.36% compared to Dimensional US Vector Equity ETF (DXUV) at 3.14%. This indicates that SNPD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DXUV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SNPD	DXUV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.36%	3.14%	+1.22%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.84%	9.42%	-0.58%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.50%	12.82%	-1.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.15%	16.92%	-3.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.15%	16.92%	-3.77%

SNPD vs. DXUV - Expense Ratio Comparison

SNPD has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than DXUV's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

SNPD vs. DXUV - Dividend Comparison

SNPD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.14%, more than DXUV's 0.96% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
DXUV Dimensional US Vector Equity ETF	0.96%	1.01%	0.37%	0.00%	0.00%
SNPD Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF	3.14%	3.10%	2.78%	2.63%	0.57%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SNPD and DXUV in my portfolio?

SNPD and DXUV have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SNPD or DXUV?

SNPD has higher volatility (4.36%) compared to DXUV (3.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNPD dropped -15.80% vs DXUV's -21.08%.

Which ETF is better, SNPD or DXUV?

On 1-year performance, DXUV leads with 28.06% vs 20.68% for SNPD. On fees, SNPD is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, DXUV has been the lower-risk option at 3.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SNPD or DXUV?

Over the 1-year period, DXUV has performed better with a 28.06% return vs 20.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SNPD or DXUV?

SNPD is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for DXUV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SNPD or DXUV?

SNPD has the higher dividend yield at 3.14%, compared with 0.96% for DXUV.

What is the main difference between SNPD and DXUV?

They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Dimensional. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SNPD and 0.25% for DXUV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DXUV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.