PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SNPD vs. BNO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SNPD vs. BNO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF (SNPD) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SNPD achieves a 15.04% return, which is significantly lower than BNO's 77.90% return.


SNPD

1D
-0.56%
1M
0.85%
6M
7.73%
YTD
15.04%
1Y
20.01%
3Y*
8.64%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
8.91%

BNO

1D
1.45%
1M
27.00%
6M
52.90%
YTD
77.90%
1Y
62.83%
3Y*
20.31%
5Y*
20.89%
10Y*
15.06%
ALL TIME*
4.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$107.13M$97.34M$147.52M
$14.25K$34.67K$29.79K

SNPD vs. BNO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
SNPD
Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF
15.04%6.66%5.41%2.68%3.49%
BNO
United States Brent Oil Fund LP
77.90%-5.44%9.67%-3.43%-9.39%

Correlation

The correlation between SNPD and BNO is -0.22, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

-0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2022

0.01

The correlation between SNPD and BNO shifts across timeframes, from -0.22 (1 year) to 0.01 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SNPD vs. BNO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SNPD
SNPD Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
SNPD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SNPD Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
SNPD Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
SNPD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
SNPD Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

BNO
BNO Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
BNO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNO Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
BNO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNO Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SNPD vs. BNO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF (SNPD) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SNPDBNODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.24

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.27

1.70

+0.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.79

5.15

+1.64

SNPD vs. BNO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SNPD Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is higher than the BNO Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SNPD and BNO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SNPD vs. BNO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNPD drawdown since its inception was -15.80%, smaller than the maximum BNO drawdown of -87.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNPD and BNO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SNPDBNODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.80%

-87.06%

+71.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.68%

-34.46%

+25.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.80%

-34.46%

+18.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.65%

-16.21%

+13.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.81%

-39.99%

+36.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.90%

11.86%

-8.96%

Volatility

SNPD vs. BNO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF (SNPD) is 4.52%, while United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO) has a volatility of 17.47%. This indicates that SNPD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BNO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SNPDBNODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.52%

17.47%

-12.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.86%

40.96%

-32.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.50%

44.54%

-33.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.15%

36.41%

-23.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.15%

36.98%

-23.83%

SNPD vs. BNO - Expense Ratio Comparison

SNPD has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than BNO's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

SNPD vs. BNO - Dividend Comparison

SNPD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.16%, while BNO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BNO
United States Brent Oil Fund LP
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SNPD
Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF
3.16%3.10%2.78%2.63%0.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


SNPD and BNO have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BNO has higher volatility (17.47%) compared to SNPD (4.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNPD dropped -15.80% vs BNO's -87.06%.

On 3-year performance, BNO leads with 20.31% vs 8.64% for SNPD. On fees, SNPD is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SNPD has been the lower-risk option at 4.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, BNO has performed better with a 20.31% return vs 8.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SNPD is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for BNO.

SNPD has the higher dividend yield at 3.16%, compared with 0.00% for BNO.

SNPD is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while BNO is Oil & Gas. SNPD tracks S&P ESG High Yield Dividend Aristocrats Index, while BNO tracks Crude Oil Brent ICE Near Term Futures. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and USCF. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SNPD and 1.00% for BNO.

SNPD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SNPD and BNO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer