SNOY vs. LQTI

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

SNOY (YieldMax SNOW Option Income Strategy ETF) and LQTI (FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SNOY returned 13.22% vs 5.55% for LQTI. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SNOY charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for LQTI.

Performance

SNOY vs. LQTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax SNOW Option Income Strategy ETF (SNOY) and FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SNOY achieves a 10.81% return, which is significantly higher than LQTI's 0.63% return.

SNOY

• 1D: 0.84%
• 1M: 63.46%
• YTD: 10.81%
• 6M: 5.59%
• 1Y: 13.22%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LQTI

• 1D: 0.47%
• 1M: 0.49%
• YTD: 0.63%
• 6M: 0.68%
• 1Y: 5.55%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SNOY vs. LQTI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SNOY YieldMax SNOW Option Income Strategy ETF	10.81%	10.03%
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF	0.63%	6.69%

Correlation

The correlation between SNOY and LQTI is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.06
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2025	0.06

Return for Risk

SNOY vs. LQTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SNOY

SNOY Risk / Return Rank: 15
SNOY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
SNOY Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
SNOY Omega Ratio Rank: 18
SNOY Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
SNOY Martin Ratio Rank: 12

LQTI

LQTI Risk / Return Rank: 31
LQTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
LQTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
LQTI Omega Ratio Rank: 29
LQTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
LQTI Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SNOY vs. LQTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax SNOW Option Income Strategy ETF (SNOY) and FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SNOY	LQTI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.23	1.10	-0.86
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.85	1.60	-0.75
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.19	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.26	1.64	-1.38
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.58	5.02	-4.44
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SNOY vs. LQTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SNOY Sharpe Ratio is 0.23, which is lower than the LQTI Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SNOY and LQTI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SNOY	LQTI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.23	1.10	-0.86
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.63	0.94	-0.31

Drawdowns

SNOY vs. LQTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNOY drawdown since its inception was -50.90%, which is greater than LQTI's maximum drawdown of -3.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNOY and LQTI.

Drawdown Indicators

	SNOY	LQTI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.90%	-3.41%	-47.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-50.90%	-3.41%	-47.49%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.07%	-0.97%	-9.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.74%	-0.88%	-11.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	22.97%	1.11%	+21.86%

Volatility

SNOY vs. LQTI - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax SNOW Option Income Strategy ETF (SNOY) has a higher volatility of 34.07% compared to FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI) at 1.67%. This indicates that SNOY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LQTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SNOY	LQTI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	34.07%	1.67%	+32.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	48.65%	4.04%	+44.61%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	57.40%	5.12%	+52.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	52.21%	5.97%	+46.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	52.21%	5.97%	+46.24%

SNOY vs. LQTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

SNOY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than LQTI's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

SNOY vs. LQTI - Dividend Comparison

SNOY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 77.80%, more than LQTI's 9.07% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF	9.07%	7.01%	0.00%
SNOY YieldMax SNOW Option Income Strategy ETF	77.80%	84.96%	33.32%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SNOY and LQTI in my portfolio?

SNOY and LQTI have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SNOY or LQTI?

SNOY has higher volatility (34.07%) compared to LQTI (1.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNOY dropped -50.90% vs LQTI's -3.41%.

Which ETF is better, SNOY or LQTI?

On 1-year performance, SNOY leads with 13.22% vs 5.55% for LQTI. On fees, LQTI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, LQTI has been the lower-risk option at 1.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SNOY or LQTI?

Over the 1-year period, SNOY has performed better with a 13.22% return vs 5.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SNOY or LQTI?

LQTI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for SNOY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SNOY or LQTI?

SNOY has the higher dividend yield at 77.80%, compared with 9.07% for LQTI.

What is the main difference between SNOY and LQTI?

They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for SNOY and 0.65% for LQTI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LQTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.10 vs 0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.