PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SNOY vs. GPIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SNOY vs. GPIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax SNOW Option Income Strategy ETF (SNOY) and Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SNOY having a 9.89% return and GPIX slightly higher at 9.91%.


SNOY

1D
-5.43%
1M
59.59%
YTD
9.89%
6M
-4.49%
1Y
12.02%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GPIX

1D
-0.48%
1M
4.27%
YTD
9.91%
6M
10.34%
1Y
25.55%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SNOY vs. GPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
SNOY
YieldMax SNOW Option Income Strategy ETF
9.89%30.66%21.03%
GPIX
Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF
9.91%16.25%10.19%

Correlation

The correlation between SNOY and GPIX is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2024

0.44

The correlation between SNOY and GPIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (1 year) to 0.44 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SNOY vs. GPIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SNOY
SNOY Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
SNOY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SNOY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
SNOY Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
SNOY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
SNOY Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

GPIX
GPIX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
GPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
GPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
GPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
GPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SNOY vs. GPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax SNOW Option Income Strategy ETF (SNOY) and Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SNOYGPIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.48

-0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.24

3.33

-3.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.52

16.77

-16.25

SNOY vs. GPIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SNOY Sharpe Ratio is 0.21, which is lower than the GPIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SNOY and GPIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SNOYGPIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

2.52

-2.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

1.78

-1.16

Drawdowns

SNOY vs. GPIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNOY drawdown since its inception was -50.90%, which is greater than GPIX's maximum drawdown of -17.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNOY and GPIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SNOYGPIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.90%

-17.50%

-33.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-50.90%

-7.71%

-43.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.82%

-0.48%

-10.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.75%

-1.48%

-11.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

22.96%

1.53%

+21.43%

Volatility

SNOY vs. GPIX - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax SNOW Option Income Strategy ETF (SNOY) has a higher volatility of 34.27% compared to Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX) at 2.26%. This indicates that SNOY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SNOYGPIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

34.27%

2.26%

+32.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

48.74%

7.89%

+40.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

57.40%

10.17%

+47.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

52.26%

13.80%

+38.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

52.26%

13.80%

+38.46%

SNOY vs. GPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SNOY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than GPIX's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

SNOY vs. GPIX - Dividend Comparison

SNOY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 74.63%, more than GPIX's 8.00% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
GPIX
Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF
8.00%8.01%7.45%1.40%
SNOY
YieldMax SNOW Option Income Strategy ETF
74.63%84.96%33.32%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SNOY and GPIX have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SNOY has higher volatility (34.27%) compared to GPIX (2.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNOY dropped -50.90% vs GPIX's -17.50%.

On 1-year performance, GPIX leads with 25.55% vs 12.02% for SNOY. On fees, GPIX is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, GPIX has been the lower-risk option at 2.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GPIX has performed better with a 25.55% return vs 12.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GPIX is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for SNOY.

SNOY has the higher dividend yield at 74.63%, compared with 8.00% for GPIX.

They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for SNOY and 0.29% for GPIX.

GPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SNOY and GPIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer