SNOIX vs. JAKVX
SNOIX (Easterly Snow Capital Long/Short Opportunity Fund) and JAKVX (John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class R6) are both Long-Short funds. Over the past year, SNOIX returned 27.49% vs 27.46% for JAKVX. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SNOIX charges 1.41%/yr vs 1.54%/yr for JAKVX.
Performance
SNOIX vs. JAKVX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SNOIX achieves a 9.17% return, which is significantly lower than JAKVX's 13.49% return.
SNOIX
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- -0.17%
- YTD
- 9.17%
- 6M
- 11.32%
- 1Y
- 27.49%
- 3Y*
- 15.33%
- 5Y*
- 8.57%
- 10Y*
- 10.21%
JAKVX
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 1.84%
- YTD
- 13.49%
- 6M
- 14.31%
- 1Y
- 27.46%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SNOIX vs. JAKVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SNOIX Easterly Snow Capital Long/Short Opportunity Fund | 9.17% | 21.81% |
JAKVX John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class R6 | 13.49% | 17.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between SNOIX and JAKVX is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2025 | 0.50 |
The correlation between SNOIX and JAKVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SNOIX vs. JAKVX — Risk / Return Rank
SNOIX
JAKVX
SNOIX vs. JAKVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Easterly Snow Capital Long/Short Opportunity Fund (SNOIX) and John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class R6 (JAKVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SNOIX | JAKVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.49 | 3.67 | -1.18 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.67 | 5.22 | -1.55 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.74 | -0.29 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.21 | 5.30 | +0.91 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.72 | 18.62 | +2.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SNOIX | JAKVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.49 | 3.67 | -1.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 4.10 | -3.78 |
Drawdowns
SNOIX vs. JAKVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SNOIX drawdown since its inception was -65.34%, which is greater than JAKVX's maximum drawdown of -5.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNOIX and JAKVX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SNOIX | JAKVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.34% | -5.16% | -60.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.50% | -5.16% | +0.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.33% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.66% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.43% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.94% | -0.22% | -0.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.78% | -0.80% | -8.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.35% | 1.47% | -0.12% |
Volatility
SNOIX vs. JAKVX - Volatility Comparison
Easterly Snow Capital Long/Short Opportunity Fund (SNOIX) has a higher volatility of 2.92% compared to John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class R6 (JAKVX) at 2.43%. This indicates that SNOIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JAKVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SNOIX | JAKVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.92% | 2.43% | +0.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.96% | 5.88% | +2.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.63% | 7.49% | +4.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.05% | 7.32% | +7.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.52% | 7.32% | +9.20% |
SNOIX vs. JAKVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SNOIX has a 1.41% expense ratio, which is lower than JAKVX's 1.54% expense ratio.
Dividends
SNOIX vs. JAKVX - Dividend Comparison
SNOIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.33%, less than JAKVX's 7.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JAKVX John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class R6 | 7.47% | 8.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SNOIX Easterly Snow Capital Long/Short Opportunity Fund | 6.33% | 6.91% | 5.10% | 2.29% | 7.07% | 8.98% | 1.86% | 1.95% | 2.06% | 4.80% | 0.36% | 2.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SNOIX and JAKVX have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SNOIX has higher volatility (2.92%) compared to JAKVX (2.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNOIX dropped -65.34% vs JAKVX's -5.16%.
JAKVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.67 vs 2.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SNOIX and JAKVX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer