SNIDX vs. AWF

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

SNIDX (AllianceBernstein Intermediate Duration Portfolio) and AWF (AllianceBernstein Global High Income Closed Fund) are both mutual funds - SNIDX is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund managed by AllianceBernstein, while AWF is a High Yield Bonds fund actively managed by AllianceBernstein. Over the past 10 years, SNIDX returned 1.35%/yr vs 5.43%/yr for AWF. Their 0.08 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. SNIDX charges 0.56%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for AWF.

Performance

SNIDX vs. AWF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianceBernstein Intermediate Duration Portfolio (SNIDX) and AllianceBernstein Global High Income Closed Fund (AWF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SNIDX achieves a -0.82% return, which is significantly higher than AWF's -1.80% return. Over the past 10 years, SNIDX has underperformed AWF with an annualized return of 1.35%, while AWF has yielded a comparatively higher 5.43% annualized return.

SNIDX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -0.91%
• 6M: -0.96%
• YTD: -0.82%
• 1Y: 1.53%
• 3Y*: 3.14%
• 5Y*: -1.03%
• 10Y*: 1.35%
• ALL TIME*: 4.69%

AWF

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: -1.08%
• 6M: -1.77%
• YTD: -1.80%
• 1Y: -2.40%
• 3Y*: 8.40%
• 5Y*: 3.67%
• 10Y*: 5.43%
• ALL TIME*: 6.25%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AWF AllianceBernstein Global High Income Closed Fund	$3.00M	$3.41M	$3.90M
SNIDX AllianceBernstein Intermediate Duration Portfolio	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

SNIDX vs. AWF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SNIDX AllianceBernstein Intermediate Duration Portfolio	-0.82%	6.19%	1.26%	4.15%	-13.85%	-1.05%	7.16%	8.67%	2.28%	3.88%
AWF AllianceBernstein Global High Income Closed Fund	-1.80%	7.54%	14.30%	18.37%	-16.62%	9.95%	4.40%	23.40%	-11.35%	7.77%

Correlation

The correlation between SNIDX and AWF is 0.33, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.33
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.33
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.29
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.18
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 1993	0.08

Over the past year, SNIDX and AWF have become more correlated (0.33) than their long-term average of 0.08, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

SNIDX vs. AWF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SNIDX

SNIDX Risk / Return Rank: 14
SNIDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
SNIDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
SNIDX Omega Ratio Rank: 13
SNIDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
SNIDX Martin Ratio Rank: 13

AWF

AWF Risk / Return Rank: 2
AWF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
AWF Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
AWF Omega Ratio Rank: 2
AWF Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
AWF Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SNIDX vs. AWF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianceBernstein Intermediate Duration Portfolio (SNIDX) and AllianceBernstein Global High Income Closed Fund (AWF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SNIDX	AWF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.62	-0.27	+0.89
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.96	-0.34	+1.29
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	0.96	+0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.73	-0.23	+0.95
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.90	-0.48	+2.38

SNIDX vs. AWF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SNIDX Sharpe Ratio is 0.62, which is higher than the AWF Sharpe Ratio of -0.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SNIDX and AWF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SNIDX vs. AWF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNIDX drawdown since its inception was -18.79%, smaller than the maximum AWF drawdown of -55.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNIDX and AWF.

Drawdown Indicators

	SNIDX	AWF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.79%	-55.54%	+36.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.37%	-10.19%	+6.82%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.41%	-11.12%	+5.71%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.66%	-25.25%	+6.59%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-18.79%	-40.12%	+21.33%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.39%	-5.90%	+0.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.25%	-12.27%	+10.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.29%	4.80%	-3.51%

Volatility

SNIDX vs. AWF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AllianceBernstein Intermediate Duration Portfolio (SNIDX) is 1.02%, while AllianceBernstein Global High Income Closed Fund (AWF) has a volatility of 1.73%. This indicates that SNIDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AWF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SNIDX	AWF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.02%	1.73%	-0.71%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.14%	7.45%	-4.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.97%	8.45%	-4.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.88%	12.09%	-6.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.88%	15.17%	-10.29%

SNIDX vs. AWF - Expense Ratio Comparison

SNIDX has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is lower than AWF's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

SNIDX vs. AWF - Dividend Comparison

SNIDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.30%, less than AWF's 7.79% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AWF AllianceBernstein Global High Income Closed Fund	7.79%	7.81%	7.47%	7.33%	10.30%	6.48%	6.68%	6.62%	7.97%	6.03%	7.73%	10.28%
SNIDX AllianceBernstein Intermediate Duration Portfolio	4.30%	3.30%	4.32%	2.53%	2.04%	2.72%	4.27%	3.01%	5.37%	2.58%	3.90%	4.34%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SNIDX and AWF in my portfolio?

SNIDX and AWF have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SNIDX or AWF?

AWF has higher volatility (1.73%) compared to SNIDX (1.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNIDX dropped -18.79% vs AWF's -55.54%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SNIDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.62 vs -0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.