SNIDX vs. ACGYX
SNIDX (AllianceBernstein Intermediate Duration Portfolio) and ACGYX (AB Income Fund) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds from AllianceBernstein. Over the past 10 years, SNIDX returned 1.35%/yr vs 1.87%/yr for ACGYX. Their correlation of 0.85 means they have usually moved in the same direction. SNIDX charges 0.56%/yr vs 0.54%/yr for ACGYX.
Performance
SNIDX vs. ACGYX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SNIDX achieves a -0.82% return, which is significantly lower than ACGYX's -0.55% return. Over the past 10 years, SNIDX has underperformed ACGYX with an annualized return of 1.35%, while ACGYX has yielded a comparatively higher 1.87% annualized return.
SNIDX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.91%
- 6M
- -0.96%
- YTD
- -0.82%
- 1Y
- 1.53%
- 3Y*
- 3.14%
- 5Y*
- -1.03%
- 10Y*
- 1.35%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.69%
ACGYX
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- -1.26%
- 6M
- -0.96%
- YTD
- -0.55%
- 1Y
- 1.95%
- 3Y*
- 4.29%
- 5Y*
- -0.63%
- 10Y*
- 1.87%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.13%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
ACGYX AB Income Fund | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
SNIDX vs. ACGYX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SNIDX AllianceBernstein Intermediate Duration Portfolio | -0.82% | 6.19% | 1.26% | 4.15% | -13.85% | -1.05% | 7.16% | 8.67% | 2.28% | 3.88% |
ACGYX AB Income Fund | -0.55% | 7.86% | 2.07% | 6.16% | -15.45% | -1.30% | 6.88% | 11.25% | -1.21% | 6.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between SNIDX and ACGYX is 0.85, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.93 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2016 | 0.85 |
The correlation between SNIDX and ACGYX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SNIDX vs. ACGYX — Risk / Return Rank
SNIDX
ACGYX
SNIDX vs. ACGYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianceBernstein Intermediate Duration Portfolio (SNIDX) and AB Income Fund (ACGYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SNIDX | ACGYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.14 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.73 | 1.00 | -0.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.90 | 2.74 | -0.85 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SNIDX vs. ACGYX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SNIDX drawdown since its inception was -18.79%, smaller than the maximum ACGYX drawdown of -21.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNIDX and ACGYX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SNIDX | ACGYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.79% | -21.58% | +2.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.37% | -3.36% | -0.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.41% | -5.82% | +0.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.66% | -21.52% | +2.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.79% | -21.58% | +2.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.39% | -3.33% | -2.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.25% | -5.36% | +3.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.29% | 1.22% | +0.07% |
Volatility
SNIDX vs. ACGYX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AllianceBernstein Intermediate Duration Portfolio (SNIDX) is 1.02%, while AB Income Fund (ACGYX) has a volatility of 1.18%. This indicates that SNIDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ACGYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SNIDX | ACGYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.02% | 1.18% | -0.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.14% | 3.56% | -0.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.97% | 4.37% | -0.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.88% | 6.52% | -0.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.88% | 5.48% | -0.60% |
SNIDX vs. ACGYX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SNIDX has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is higher than ACGYX's 0.54% expense ratio.
Dividends
SNIDX vs. ACGYX - Dividend Comparison
SNIDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.30%, less than ACGYX's 4.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACGYX AB Income Fund | 4.55% | 5.02% | 5.38% | 4.04% | 3.99% | 2.95% | 3.80% | 4.50% | 4.54% | 5.84% | 3.23% | 0.00% |
SNIDX AllianceBernstein Intermediate Duration Portfolio | 4.30% | 3.30% | 4.32% | 2.53% | 2.04% | 2.72% | 4.27% | 3.01% | 5.37% | 2.58% | 3.90% | 4.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SNIDX and ACGYX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ACGYX has higher volatility (1.18%) compared to SNIDX (1.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNIDX dropped -18.79% vs ACGYX's -21.58%.
ACGYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.77 vs 0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SNIDX and ACGYX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer