SNDU vs. XDSQ
SNDU (T-REX 2X Long SNDK Daily Target ETF) and XDSQ (Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. SNDU is passively managed, while XDSQ is actively managed. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SNDU charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for XDSQ.
Performance
SNDU vs. XDSQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SNDU
- 1D
- 6.28%
- 1M
- -21.69%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XDSQ
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- 1.29%
- 6M
- 2.79%
- YTD
- 4.31%
- 1Y
- 14.91%
- 3Y*
- 14.90%
- 5Y*
- 9.64%
- 10Y*
- —
SNDU vs. XDSQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SNDU T-REX 2X Long SNDK Daily Target ETF | 461.44% |
XDSQ Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF | 4.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between SNDU and XDSQ is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2026 | 0.35 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SNDU vs. XDSQ — Risk / Return Rank
SNDU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
XDSQ
SNDU vs. XDSQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long SNDK Daily Target ETF (SNDU) and Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SNDU | XDSQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.29 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.54 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 7.32 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SNDU vs. XDSQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SNDU drawdown since its inception was -56.44%, which is greater than XDSQ's maximum drawdown of -26.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNDU and XDSQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SNDU | XDSQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.44% | -26.06% | -30.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.60% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.15% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.06% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -39.57% | 0.00% | -39.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.78% | -4.87% | -8.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.01% | — |
Volatility
SNDU vs. XDSQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SNDU | XDSQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.32% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.89% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 221.91% | 10.53% | +211.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 221.91% | 15.27% | +206.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 221.91% | 14.96% | +206.95% |
SNDU vs. XDSQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
SNDU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than XDSQ's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
SNDU vs. XDSQ - Dividend Comparison
Neither SNDU nor XDSQ has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SNDU and XDSQ have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XDSQ is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDSQ is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for SNDU.
SNDU and XDSQ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for SNDU and 0.79% for XDSQ.
Find the right allocation for SNDU and XDSQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer