SNDU vs. TTDU

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SNDU (T-REX 2X Long SNDK Daily Target ETF) and TTDU (T-REX 2X Long TTD Daily Target ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from T-Rex. SNDU is passively managed, while TTDU is actively managed. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 1.50% expense ratio.

Performance

SNDU vs. TTDU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-REX 2X Long SNDK Daily Target ETF (SNDU) and T-REX 2X Long TTD Daily Target ETF (TTDU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

SNDU

• 1D: 13.19%
• 1M: 94.94%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TTDU

• 1D: -5.44%
• 1M: -31.38%
• YTD: -77.55%
• 6M: -78.75%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SNDU vs. TTDU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
SNDU T-REX 2X Long SNDK Daily Target ETF	586.89%
TTDU T-REX 2X Long TTD Daily Target ETF	-47.87%

Correlation

The correlation between SNDU and TTDU is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2026	0.09

Return for Risk

SNDU vs. TTDU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long SNDK Daily Target ETF (SNDU) and T-REX 2X Long TTD Daily Target ETF (TTDU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SNDU	TTDU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2,725.02	-0.87	+2,725.89

Drawdowns

SNDU vs. TTDU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNDU drawdown since its inception was -46.69%, smaller than the maximum TTDU drawdown of -89.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNDU and TTDU.

Drawdown Indicators

	SNDU	TTDU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-46.69%	-89.89%	+43.20%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-89.89%	+89.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.22%	-59.22%	+49.00%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SNDU	TTDU	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	185.48%	107.88%	+77.60%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	185.48%	107.88%	+77.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	185.48%	107.88%	+77.60%

SNDU vs. TTDU - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SNDU and TTDU have an expense ratio of 1.50%.

Dividends

SNDU vs. TTDU - Dividend Comparison

Neither SNDU nor TTDU has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SNDU and TTDU in my portfolio?

SNDU and TTDU have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SNDU or TTDU?

Both ETFs have the same 1.50% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SNDU or TTDU?

SNDU and TTDU have the same expense ratio: 1.50% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SNDU or TTDU?

SNDU and TTDU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.