PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SNDU vs. BLSG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SNDU vs. BLSG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-REX 2X Long SNDK Daily Target ETF (SNDU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long BLSH Daily ETF (BLSG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


SNDU

1D
13.19%
1M
94.94%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BLSG

1D
-15.77%
1M
-55.27%
YTD
-58.79%
6M
-73.27%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SNDU vs. BLSG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SNDU and BLSG is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2026

0.24

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SNDU vs. BLSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long SNDK Daily Target ETF (SNDU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long BLSH Daily ETF (BLSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SNDU vs. BLSG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SNDUBLSGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2,725.02

-0.66

+2,725.68

Drawdowns

SNDU vs. BLSG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNDU drawdown since its inception was -46.69%, smaller than the maximum BLSG drawdown of -83.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNDU and BLSG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SNDUBLSGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.69%

-83.67%

+36.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-83.52%

+83.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.22%

-60.12%

+49.90%

Volatility

SNDU vs. BLSG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SNDUBLSGDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

185.48%

145.44%

+40.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

185.48%

145.44%

+40.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

185.48%

145.44%

+40.04%

SNDU vs. BLSG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SNDU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than BLSG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

SNDU vs. BLSG - Dividend Comparison

Neither SNDU nor BLSG has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SNDU and BLSG have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BLSG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BLSG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for SNDU.

SNDU and BLSG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for SNDU and 0.75% for BLSG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SNDU and BLSG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer