PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SNDK vs. HL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SNDK vs. HL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sandisk Corporation (SNDK) and Hecla Mining Company (HL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SNDK achieves a 734.15% return, which is significantly higher than HL's -20.29% return.


SNDK

1D
5.24%
1M
36.82%
YTD
734.15%
6M
860.37%
1Y
4,694.43%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HL

1D
2.00%
1M
-27.35%
YTD
-20.29%
6M
-18.68%
1Y
155.56%
3Y*
42.93%
5Y*
11.61%
10Y*
13.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SNDK vs. HL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
SNDK
Sandisk Corporation
734.15%356.50%
HL
Hecla Mining Company
-20.29%268.44%

Correlation

The correlation between SNDK and HL is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2025

0.22

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SNDK:

$310.88B

HL:

$10.32B

EPS

SNDK:

$29.70

HL:

$0.84

PE Ratio

SNDK:

66.67

HL:

18.18

PS Ratio

SNDK:

22.79

HL:

6.47

PB Ratio

SNDK:

22.56

HL:

4.02

Total Revenue (TTM)

SNDK:

$13.18B

HL:

$1.57B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SNDK:

$7.39B

HL:

$788.95M

EBITDA (TTM)

SNDK:

$5.37B

HL:

$864.40M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SNDK vs. HL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SNDK
SNDK Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
SNDK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SNDK Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
SNDK Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
SNDK Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
SNDK Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

HL
HL Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
HL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
HL Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
HL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
HL Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SNDK vs. HL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sandisk Corporation (SNDK) and Hecla Mining Company (HL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SNDKHLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+45.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+5.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.16

1.32

+0.84

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

152.17

2.80

+149.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

461.00

6.33

+454.67

SNDK vs. HL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SNDK Sharpe Ratio is 47.94, which is higher than the HL Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SNDK and HL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SNDK vs. HL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNDK drawdown since its inception was -47.50%, smaller than the maximum HL drawdown of -97.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNDK and HL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SNDKHLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.50%

-97.92%

+50.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.34%

-55.81%

+24.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-55.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-61.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-82.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-51.91%

+51.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.74%

-69.93%

+56.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.32%

24.67%

-14.35%

Volatility

SNDK vs. HL - Volatility Comparison

Sandisk Corporation (SNDK) has a higher volatility of 26.68% compared to Hecla Mining Company (HL) at 22.72%. This indicates that SNDK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SNDKHLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

26.68%

22.72%

+3.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

71.96%

54.93%

+17.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

99.48%

72.59%

+26.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

97.64%

59.35%

+38.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

97.64%

62.77%

+34.87%

Dividends

SNDK vs. HL - Dividend Comparison

SNDK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HL
Hecla Mining Company
0.10%0.08%0.81%0.65%0.40%0.72%0.25%0.29%0.42%0.25%0.19%0.53%
SNDK
Sandisk Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

SNDK vs. HL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sandisk Corporation and Hecla Mining Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026April
5.95B
411.43M
(SNDK) Total Revenue
(HL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

SNDK vs. HL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Sandisk Corporation and Hecla Mining Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026April
78.4%
61.6%
Portfolio components
SNDK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sandisk Corporation reported a gross profit of 4.66B and revenue of 5.95B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 78.4%.

HL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hecla Mining Company reported a gross profit of 253.26M and revenue of 411.43M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.6%.

SNDK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sandisk Corporation reported an operating income of 4.11B and revenue of 5.95B, resulting in an operating margin of 69.1%.

HL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hecla Mining Company reported an operating income of 223.11M and revenue of 411.43M, resulting in an operating margin of 54.2%.

SNDK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sandisk Corporation reported a net income of 3.62B and revenue of 5.95B, resulting in a net margin of 60.8%.

HL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hecla Mining Company reported a net income of 266.45M and revenue of 411.43M, resulting in a net margin of 64.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SNDK and HL have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SNDK has higher volatility (26.68%) compared to HL (22.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNDK dropped -47.50% vs HL's -97.92%.

SNDK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (47.94 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SNDK and HL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer