PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SNAZ.DE vs. XQUD.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SNAZ.DE vs. XQUD.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares J.P. Morgan $ EM Corp Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (SNAZ.DE) and Xtrackers ESG USD Emerging Markets Bond Quality Weighted UCITS ETF (XQUD.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SNAZ.DE achieves a 0.59% return, which is significantly lower than XQUD.DE's 2.96% return.


SNAZ.DE

1D
0.39%
1M
-0.19%
6M
0.39%
YTD
0.59%
1Y
3.64%
3Y*
4.79%
5Y*
-0.19%
10Y*

XQUD.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
0.25%
6M
1.78%
YTD
2.96%
1Y
7.40%
3Y*
3.78%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SNAZ.DE vs. XQUD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
SNAZ.DE
iShares J.P. Morgan $ EM Corp Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc)
0.59%6.26%4.36%5.28%0.00%
XQUD.DE
Xtrackers ESG USD Emerging Markets Bond Quality Weighted UCITS ETF
2.96%-1.36%5.23%3.70%-0.19%

Correlation

The correlation between SNAZ.DE and XQUD.DE is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2022

0.38

The correlation between SNAZ.DE and XQUD.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (1 year) to 0.38 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SNAZ.DE vs. XQUD.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SNAZ.DE
SNAZ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
SNAZ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SNAZ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
SNAZ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
SNAZ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
SNAZ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

XQUD.DE
XQUD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
XQUD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XQUD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
XQUD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
XQUD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
XQUD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SNAZ.DE vs. XQUD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares J.P. Morgan $ EM Corp Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (SNAZ.DE) and Xtrackers ESG USD Emerging Markets Bond Quality Weighted UCITS ETF (XQUD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SNAZ.DEXQUD.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.25

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.25

1.94

-0.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.53

5.79

-1.25

SNAZ.DE vs. XQUD.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SNAZ.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is comparable to the XQUD.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SNAZ.DE and XQUD.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SNAZ.DE vs. XQUD.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNAZ.DE drawdown since its inception was -21.88%, which is greater than XQUD.DE's maximum drawdown of -12.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNAZ.DE and XQUD.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SNAZ.DEXQUD.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.88%

-12.01%

-9.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.91%

-3.84%

+0.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.82%

-11.40%

+7.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.73%

-2.05%

+0.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.60%

-5.42%

-2.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.80%

1.28%

-0.48%

Volatility

SNAZ.DE vs. XQUD.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares J.P. Morgan $ EM Corp Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (SNAZ.DE) and Xtrackers ESG USD Emerging Markets Bond Quality Weighted UCITS ETF (XQUD.DE) have volatilities of 1.09% and 1.14%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SNAZ.DEXQUD.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.09%

1.14%

-0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.81%

3.77%

-0.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.45%

5.73%

-2.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.07%

7.94%

-2.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.63%

7.94%

-0.31%

SNAZ.DE vs. XQUD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SNAZ.DE has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is higher than XQUD.DE's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

SNAZ.DE vs. XQUD.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither SNAZ.DE nor XQUD.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SNAZ.DE and XQUD.DE have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XQUD.DE is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XQUD.DE is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.53% for SNAZ.DE.

SNAZ.DE tracks J.P. Morgan CEMBI Broad Diversified Core Index (EUR Hedged), while XQUD.DE tracks iBoxx® MSCI ESG USD Emerging Markets Sovereigns Quality Weighted. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.53% for SNAZ.DE and 0.45% for XQUD.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SNAZ.DE and XQUD.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer