PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SNAV vs. TEXN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SNAV vs. TEXN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Mohr Sector Nav ETF (SNAV) and iShares Texas Equity ETF (TEXN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SNAV achieves a 11.57% return, which is significantly lower than TEXN's 25.94% return.


SNAV

1D
-0.67%
1M
6.93%
YTD
11.57%
6M
11.36%
1Y
25.19%
3Y*
15.57%
5Y*
10Y*

TEXN

1D
-0.24%
1M
5.35%
YTD
25.94%
6M
24.41%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SNAV vs. TEXN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
SNAV
Mohr Sector Nav ETF
11.57%9.91%
TEXN
iShares Texas Equity ETF
25.94%8.16%

Correlation

The correlation between SNAV and TEXN is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2025

0.68

SNAV vs. TEXN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SNAV
TEXN

Technology

38.4%
15.5%

Financial Services

16.5%
4.1%

Healthcare

14.5%
2.9%

Industrials

6.6%
16.9%

Consumer Cyclical

6.5%
10.8%

Communication Services

5.8%
3.6%

Consumer Defensive

3.4%
2.1%

Energy

2.4%
36.1%

Utilities

2.2%
2.9%

Real Estate

2.1%
4.2%

Basic Materials

1.6%
0.8%

Technology

SNAV
38.4%
TEXN
15.5%

Financial Services

SNAV
16.5%
TEXN
4.1%

Healthcare

SNAV
14.5%
TEXN
2.9%

Industrials

SNAV
6.6%
TEXN
16.9%

Consumer Cyclical

SNAV
6.5%
TEXN
10.8%

Communication Services

SNAV
5.8%
TEXN
3.6%

Consumer Defensive

SNAV
3.4%
TEXN
2.1%

Energy

SNAV
2.4%
TEXN
36.1%

Utilities

SNAV
2.2%
TEXN
2.9%

Real Estate

SNAV
2.1%
TEXN
4.2%

Basic Materials

SNAV
1.6%
TEXN
0.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SNAV vs. TEXN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SNAV
SNAV Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
SNAV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SNAV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
SNAV Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
SNAV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
SNAV Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

TEXN
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SNAV vs. TEXN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mohr Sector Nav ETF (SNAV) and iShares Texas Equity ETF (TEXN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SNAVTEXNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.09

SNAV vs. TEXN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SNAVTEXNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.11

2.75

-1.64

Drawdowns

SNAV vs. TEXN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNAV drawdown since its inception was -16.61%, which is greater than TEXN's maximum drawdown of -6.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNAV and TEXN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SNAVTEXNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.61%

-6.34%

-10.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.67%

-0.24%

-0.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.51%

-1.12%

-1.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.79%

Volatility

SNAV vs. TEXN - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SNAVTEXNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.68%

14.19%

-3.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.64%

14.19%

-0.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.64%

14.19%

-0.55%

SNAV vs. TEXN - Expense Ratio Comparison

SNAV has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than TEXN's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

SNAV vs. TEXN - Dividend Comparison

SNAV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TEXN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%.


PositionTTM202520242023
SNAV
Mohr Sector Nav ETF
0.00%0.00%0.94%3.29%
TEXN
iShares Texas Equity ETF
1.01%0.86%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SNAV and TEXN have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TEXN is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TEXN is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for SNAV.

TEXN has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.00% for SNAV.

They also come from different issuers: Mohr Funds and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for SNAV and 0.20% for TEXN.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SNAV and TEXN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer