SNAV vs. BLCR

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SNAV (Mohr Sector Nav ETF) and BLCR (Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SNAV returned 25.19% vs 47.09% for BLCR. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SNAV charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for BLCR.

Performance

SNAV vs. BLCR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Mohr Sector Nav ETF (SNAV) and Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF (BLCR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SNAV achieves a 11.57% return, which is significantly lower than BLCR's 19.56% return.

SNAV

• 1D: -0.67%
• 1M: 6.93%
• YTD: 11.57%
• 6M: 11.36%
• 1Y: 25.19%
• 3Y*: 15.57%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BLCR

• 1D: -0.33%
• 1M: 6.16%
• YTD: 19.56%
• 6M: 21.53%
• 1Y: 47.09%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SNAV vs. BLCR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
SNAV Mohr Sector Nav ETF	11.57%	15.54%	11.11%	14.88%
BLCR Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF	19.56%	30.93%	17.07%	14.18%

Correlation

The correlation between SNAV and BLCR is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2023	0.84

The correlation between SNAV and BLCR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

SNAV vs. BLCR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SNAV	BLCR
Technology	38.4%	35.7%
Financial Services	16.5%	12.1%
Healthcare	14.5%	7.6%
Industrials	6.6%	13.5%
Consumer Cyclical	6.5%	10.9%
Communication Services	5.8%	11.0%
Consumer Defensive	3.4%	-
Energy	2.4%	2.2%
Utilities	2.2%	1.6%
Real Estate	2.1%	-
Basic Materials	1.6%	2.2%

Return for Risk

SNAV vs. BLCR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SNAV

SNAV Risk / Return Rank: 74
SNAV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
SNAV Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
SNAV Omega Ratio Rank: 72
SNAV Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
SNAV Martin Ratio Rank: 75

BLCR

BLCR Risk / Return Rank: 87
BLCR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
BLCR Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
BLCR Omega Ratio Rank: 85
BLCR Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
BLCR Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SNAV vs. BLCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mohr Sector Nav ETF (SNAV) and Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF (BLCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SNAV	BLCR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.37	3.05	-0.67
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.21	4.02	-0.81
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.52	-0.10
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.92	4.61	-0.69
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	14.09	21.86	-7.77
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SNAV vs. BLCR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SNAV Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is comparable to the BLCR Sharpe Ratio of 3.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SNAV and BLCR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SNAV	BLCR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.37	3.05	-0.67
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.11	1.90	-0.79

Drawdowns

SNAV vs. BLCR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNAV drawdown since its inception was -16.61%, smaller than the maximum BLCR drawdown of -21.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNAV and BLCR.

Drawdown Indicators

	SNAV	BLCR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.61%	-21.29%	+4.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.45%	-10.26%	+3.81%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.61%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.67%	-0.37%	-0.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.51%	-2.19%	-0.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.79%	2.16%	-0.37%

Volatility

SNAV vs. BLCR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Mohr Sector Nav ETF (SNAV) is 3.12%, while Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF (BLCR) has a volatility of 4.45%. This indicates that SNAV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BLCR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SNAV	BLCR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.12%	4.45%	-1.33%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.28%	12.24%	-4.96%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.68%	15.54%	-4.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.64%	17.47%	-3.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.64%	17.47%	-3.83%

SNAV vs. BLCR - Expense Ratio Comparison

SNAV has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than BLCR's 0.36% expense ratio.

Dividends

SNAV vs. BLCR - Dividend Comparison

SNAV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BLCR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BLCR Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF	0.23%	0.33%	0.75%	0.13%
SNAV Mohr Sector Nav ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.94%	3.29%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SNAV and BLCR in my portfolio?

SNAV and BLCR have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SNAV or BLCR?

BLCR has higher volatility (4.45%) compared to SNAV (3.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNAV dropped -16.61% vs BLCR's -21.29%.

Which ETF is better, SNAV or BLCR?

On 1-year performance, BLCR leads with 47.09% vs 25.19% for SNAV. On fees, BLCR is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, SNAV has been the lower-risk option at 3.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SNAV or BLCR?

Over the 1-year period, BLCR has performed better with a 47.09% return vs 25.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SNAV or BLCR?

BLCR is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for SNAV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SNAV or BLCR?

BLCR has the higher dividend yield at 0.23%, compared with 0.00% for SNAV.

What is the main difference between SNAV and BLCR?

They also come from different issuers: Mohr Funds and BlackRock. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for SNAV and 0.36% for BLCR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BLCR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.05 vs 2.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.