SNAP vs. HBM
SNAP (Snap Inc.) and HBM (Hudbay Minerals Inc.) are both stocks. SNAP operates in Internet Content & Information (Communication Services), while HBM operates in Copper (Basic Materials). Over the past 5 years, SNAP returned -39.35%/yr vs 31.42%/yr for HBM. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SNAP vs. HBM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SNAP achieves a -34.82% return, which is significantly lower than HBM's 40.23% return.
SNAP
- 1D
- -1.31%
- 1M
- -6.24%
- YTD
- -34.82%
- 6M
- -28.04%
- 1Y
- -36.63%
- 3Y*
- -20.12%
- 5Y*
- -39.35%
- 10Y*
- —
HBM
- 1D
- 4.43%
- 1M
- 0.32%
- YTD
- 40.23%
- 6M
- 49.02%
- 1Y
- 189.83%
- 3Y*
- 78.89%
- 5Y*
- 31.42%
- 10Y*
- 19.31%
SNAP vs. HBM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SNAP Snap Inc. | -34.82% | -25.07% | -36.39% | 89.16% | -80.97% | -6.07% | 206.61% | 196.37% | -62.29% | -39.12% |
HBM Hudbay Minerals Inc. | 40.23% | 145.46% | 47.03% | 9.24% | -29.87% | 3.82% | 69.50% | -11.77% | -46.20% | 3.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between SNAP and HBM is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 2017 | 0.24 |
Fundamentals
SNAP:
$8.88B
HBM:
$11.09B
SNAP:
-$0.24
HBM:
$1.65
SNAP:
1.46
HBM:
4.68
SNAP:
4.26
HBM:
3.13
SNAP:
$6.10B
HBM:
$2.37B
SNAP:
$3.40B
HBM:
$828.54M
SNAP:
-$173.71M
HBM:
$1.54B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SNAP vs. HBM — Risk / Return Rank
SNAP
HBM
SNAP vs. HBM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Snap Inc. (SNAP) and Hudbay Minerals Inc. (HBM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SNAP | HBM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 1.44 | -0.53 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.59 | 5.28 | -5.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.06 | 16.41 | -17.47 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SNAP vs. HBM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SNAP drawdown since its inception was -95.27%, roughly equal to the maximum HBM drawdown of -92.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNAP and HBM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SNAP | HBM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.27% | -92.21% | -3.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -62.03% | -36.16% | -25.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -77.48% | -41.11% | -36.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -95.27% | -63.33% | -31.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -86.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -93.67% | -12.68% | -80.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -60.04% | -52.45% | -7.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 34.45% | 11.62% | +22.83% |
Volatility
SNAP vs. HBM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Snap Inc. (SNAP) is 12.67%, while Hudbay Minerals Inc. (HBM) has a volatility of 25.87%. This indicates that SNAP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HBM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SNAP | HBM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.67% | 25.87% | -13.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.17% | 47.72% | -6.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 55.41% | 59.13% | -3.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 75.96% | 55.51% | +20.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 71.73% | 58.82% | +12.91% |
Dividends
SNAP vs. HBM - Dividend Comparison
SNAP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HBM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HBM Hudbay Minerals Inc. | 0.08% | 0.07% | 0.17% | 0.31% | 0.32% | 0.22% | 0.21% | 0.36% | 0.38% | 0.23% | 0.35% | 0.52% |
SNAP Snap Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
SNAP vs. HBM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Snap Inc. and Hudbay Minerals Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SNAP vs. HBM - Profitability Comparison
SNAP - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Snap Inc. reported a gross profit of 863.55M and revenue of 1.53B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.5%.
HBM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hudbay Minerals Inc. reported a gross profit of 340.81M and revenue of 745.43M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 45.7%.
SNAP - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Snap Inc. reported an operating income of -74.45M and revenue of 1.53B, resulting in an operating margin of -4.9%.
HBM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hudbay Minerals Inc. reported an operating income of 297.62M and revenue of 745.43M, resulting in an operating margin of 39.9%.
SNAP - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Snap Inc. reported a net income of -88.95M and revenue of 1.53B, resulting in a net margin of -5.8%.
HBM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hudbay Minerals Inc. reported a net income of 187.76M and revenue of 745.43M, resulting in a net margin of 25.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SNAP and HBM have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HBM has higher volatility (25.87%) compared to SNAP (12.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNAP dropped -95.27% vs HBM's -92.21%.
HBM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.23 vs -0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SNAP and HBM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer