SNA vs. PG
SNA (Snap-on Incorporated) and PG (The Procter & Gamble Company) are both stocks. SNA operates in Tools & Accessories (Industrials), while PG operates in Household & Personal Products (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, SNA returned 12.41%/yr vs 8.96%/yr for PG. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SNA vs. PG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SNA achieves a 13.93% return, which is significantly higher than PG's 5.93% return. Over the past 10 years, SNA has outperformed PG with an annualized return of 12.41%, while PG has yielded a comparatively lower 8.96% annualized return.
SNA
- 1D
- 0.73%
- 1M
- 8.47%
- YTD
- 13.93%
- 6M
- 11.91%
- 1Y
- 28.44%
- 3Y*
- 15.30%
- 5Y*
- 13.07%
- 10Y*
- 12.41%
PG
- 1D
- 0.86%
- 1M
- 5.68%
- YTD
- 5.93%
- 6M
- 6.28%
- 1Y
- -3.97%
- 3Y*
- 3.69%
- 5Y*
- 4.73%
- 10Y*
- 8.96%
SNA vs. PG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SNA Snap-on Incorporated | 13.93% | 4.28% | 20.67% | 29.70% | 8.91% | 28.83% | 4.03% | 19.54% | -14.86% | 3.64% |
PG The Procter & Gamble Company | 5.93% | -12.26% | 17.25% | -0.86% | -5.05% | 20.52% | 14.15% | 39.70% | 3.57% | 12.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between SNA and PG is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 1985 | 0.28 |
Fundamentals
SNA:
$20.42B
PG:
$361.53B
SNA:
$19.35
PG:
$5.23
SNA:
20.03
PG:
28.63
SNA:
3.04
PG:
7.00
SNA:
4.00
PG:
4.20
SNA:
3.43
PG:
6.70
SNA:
$5.12B
PG:
$86.72B
SNA:
$2.63B
PG:
$43.64B
SNA:
$1.47B
PG:
$22.63B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SNA vs. PG — Risk / Return Rank
SNA
PG
SNA vs. PG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Snap-on Incorporated (SNA) and The Procter & Gamble Company (PG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SNA | PG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 0.97 | +0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.93 | -0.37 | +3.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.51 | -0.68 | +8.19 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SNA vs. PG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SNA drawdown since its inception was -65.76%, which is greater than PG's maximum drawdown of -54.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNA and PG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SNA | PG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.76% | -54.25% | -11.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.47% | -15.52% | +7.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.77% | -21.15% | +0.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.77% | -23.77% | +3.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.38% | -23.77% | -23.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.16% | -13.29% | +13.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.87% | -12.16% | -1.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.36% | 8.80% | -5.44% |
Volatility
SNA vs. PG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Snap-on Incorporated (SNA) is 5.51%, while The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) has a volatility of 6.99%. This indicates that SNA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SNA | PG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.51% | 6.99% | -1.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.82% | 15.01% | -0.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.36% | 18.78% | +2.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.91% | 17.82% | +6.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.18% | 19.05% | +8.13% |
Dividends
SNA vs. PG - Dividend Comparison
SNA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.44%, less than PG's 2.85% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PG The Procter & Gamble Company | 2.85% | 2.91% | 2.36% | 2.55% | 2.38% | 2.08% | 2.24% | 2.37% | 3.09% | 2.98% | 3.18% | 3.31% |
SNA Snap-on Incorporated | 2.44% | 2.57% | 2.27% | 2.33% | 2.57% | 2.37% | 2.61% | 2.32% | 2.35% | 1.69% | 1.48% | 1.28% |
Financials
SNA vs. PG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Snap-on Incorporated and The Procter & Gamble Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SNA vs. PG - Profitability Comparison
SNA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Snap-on Incorporated reported a gross profit of 608.30M and revenue of 1.21B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 50.4%.
PG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Procter & Gamble Company reported a gross profit of 10.51B and revenue of 21.24B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.5%.
SNA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Snap-on Incorporated reported an operating income of 250.80M and revenue of 1.21B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.8%.
PG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Procter & Gamble Company reported an operating income of 4.58B and revenue of 21.24B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.6%.
SNA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Snap-on Incorporated reported a net income of 247.00M and revenue of 1.21B, resulting in a net margin of 20.5%.
PG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Procter & Gamble Company reported a net income of 18.50M and revenue of 21.24B, resulting in a net margin of 0.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SNA and PG have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PG has higher volatility (6.99%) compared to SNA (5.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNA dropped -65.76% vs PG's -54.25%.
SNA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.16 vs -0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SNA and PG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer