SMZ vs. TSLS
SMZ (Tradr 2X Short SMR Daily ETF) and TSLS (Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds - SMZ tracks the NuScale Power Corporation (SMR) while TSLS tracks the Tesla, Inc. (-100% Daily). Both are passively managed. Their 0.52 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. SMZ charges 1.49%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for TSLS.
Performance
SMZ vs. TSLS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SMZ
- 1D
- 4.06%
- 1M
- 7.24%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
TSLS
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- 22.65%
- 6M
- 27.99%
- YTD
- 33.30%
- 1Y
- -14.97%
- 3Y*
- -27.51%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -25.22%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $795.18K | $775.91K | $1.24M | |
| $28.97M | $27.46M | $30.88M |
SMZ vs. TSLS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SMZ Tradr 2X Short SMR Daily ETF | -1.46% |
TSLS Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X ETF | 26.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMZ and TSLS is 0.52, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2026 | 0.52 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMZ vs. TSLS — Risk / Return Rank
SMZ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TSLS
SMZ vs. TSLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Short SMR Daily ETF (SMZ) and Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X ETF (TSLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SMZ | TSLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.99 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.32 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -0.45 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SMZ vs. TSLS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMZ drawdown since its inception was -77.30%, smaller than the maximum TSLS drawdown of -90.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMZ and TSLS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMZ | TSLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.30% | -90.73% | +13.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -41.36% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -84.16% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -61.42% | -86.56% | +25.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.92% | -64.44% | +23.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 29.53% | — |
Volatility
SMZ vs. TSLS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMZ | TSLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 19.07% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 33.98% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 188.99% | 46.81% | +142.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 188.99% | 58.98% | +130.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 188.99% | 58.98% | +130.01% |
SMZ vs. TSLS - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMZ has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than TSLS's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMZ vs. TSLS - Dividend Comparison
SMZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TSLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.36%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMZ Tradr 2X Short SMR Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TSLS Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X ETF | 2.36% | 4.30% | 7.62% | 4.52% | 3.46% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMZ and TSLS have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TSLS is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TSLS is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.49% for SMZ.
TSLS has the higher dividend yield at 2.36%, compared with 0.00% for SMZ.
SMZ tracks NuScale Power Corporation (SMR), while TSLS tracks Tesla, Inc. (-100% Daily). They also come from different issuers: Tradr and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.49% for SMZ and 0.95% for TSLS.
Find the right allocation for SMZ and TSLS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer