SMZ vs. SPXU
SMZ (Tradr 2X Short SMR Daily ETF) and SPXU (ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500) are both exchange-traded funds - SMZ is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the NuScale Power Corporation (SMR), while SPXU is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index (-300%). Both are passively managed. Their 0.59 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. SMZ charges 1.49%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for SPXU.
Performance
SMZ vs. SPXU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SMZ
- 1D
- 4.06%
- 1M
- 7.24%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
SPXU
- 1D
- -1.95%
- 1M
- -0.35%
- 6M
- -20.84%
- YTD
- -23.69%
- 1Y
- -41.18%
- 3Y*
- -38.93%
- 5Y*
- -32.80%
- 10Y*
- -41.16%
- ALL TIME*
- -42.50%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $795.18K | $775.91K | $1.24M | |
| $315.61M | $306.13M | $365.79M |
SMZ vs. SPXU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SMZ Tradr 2X Short SMR Daily ETF | -1.46% |
SPXU ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500 | -20.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMZ and SPXU is 0.59, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2026 | 0.59 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMZ vs. SPXU — Risk / Return Rank
SMZ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SPXU
SMZ vs. SPXU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Short SMR Daily ETF (SMZ) and ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500 (SPXU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SMZ | SPXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.84 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.88 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.42 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SMZ vs. SPXU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMZ drawdown since its inception was -77.30%, smaller than the maximum SPXU drawdown of -99.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMZ and SPXU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMZ | SPXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.30% | -99.99% | +22.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -43.83% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -84.36% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -90.23% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -99.56% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -61.42% | -99.99% | +38.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.92% | -93.38% | +52.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 26.91% | — |
Volatility
SMZ vs. SPXU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMZ | SPXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 10.60% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 30.38% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 188.99% | 38.43% | +150.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 188.99% | 50.68% | +138.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 188.99% | 53.40% | +135.59% |
SMZ vs. SPXU - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMZ has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than SPXU's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMZ vs. SPXU - Dividend Comparison
SMZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPXU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.80%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMZ Tradr 2X Short SMR Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPXU ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500 | 6.80% | 7.02% | 9.53% | 7.06% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.70% | 2.14% | 1.41% | 0.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMZ and SPXU have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPXU is cheaper at 0.90% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPXU is cheaper with a 0.90% expense ratio, compared with 1.49% for SMZ.
SPXU has the higher dividend yield at 6.80%, compared with 0.00% for SMZ.
SMZ is categorized as Inverse Equities, while SPXU is S&P 500. SMZ tracks NuScale Power Corporation (SMR), while SPXU tracks S&P 500 Index (-300%). They also come from different issuers: Tradr and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.49% for SMZ and 0.90% for SPXU.
Find the right allocation for SMZ and SPXU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer