SMZ vs. SPDN
SMZ (Tradr 2X Short SMR Daily ETF) and SPDN (Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1x Shares) are both Inverse Equities funds - SMZ tracks the NuScale Power Corporation (SMR) while SPDN tracks the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Their 0.60 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. SMZ charges 1.49%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for SPDN.
Performance
SMZ vs. SPDN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SMZ
- 1D
- 4.06%
- 1M
- 7.24%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
SPDN
- 1D
- -0.80%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- 6M
- -5.52%
- YTD
- -6.42%
- 1Y
- -12.79%
- 3Y*
- -10.75%
- 5Y*
- -7.84%
- 10Y*
- -12.18%
- ALL TIME*
- -12.21%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $795.18K | $775.91K | $1.24M | |
| $433.42M | $387.95M | $422.31M |
SMZ vs. SPDN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SMZ Tradr 2X Short SMR Daily ETF | -1.46% |
SPDN Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1x Shares | -5.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMZ and SPDN is 0.60, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2026 | 0.60 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMZ vs. SPDN — Risk / Return Rank
SMZ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SPDN
SMZ vs. SPDN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Short SMR Daily ETF (SMZ) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1x Shares (SPDN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SMZ | SPDN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.87 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.71 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.27 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SMZ vs. SPDN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMZ drawdown since its inception was -77.30%, roughly equal to the maximum SPDN drawdown of -75.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMZ and SPDN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMZ | SPDN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.30% | -75.31% | -1.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -15.93% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -38.24% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -43.85% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -73.97% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -61.42% | -74.80% | +13.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.92% | -48.93% | +8.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 8.90% | — |
Volatility
SMZ vs. SPDN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMZ | SPDN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.55% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.15% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 188.99% | 12.98% | +176.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 188.99% | 16.97% | +172.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 188.99% | 18.03% | +170.96% |
SMZ vs. SPDN - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMZ has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than SPDN's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMZ vs. SPDN - Dividend Comparison
SMZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPDN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.32%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMZ Tradr 2X Short SMR Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPDN Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1x Shares | 3.32% | 4.06% | 5.32% | 5.84% | 0.96% | 0.00% | 0.10% | 1.89% | 1.24% | 0.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMZ and SPDN have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPDN is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPDN is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.49% for SMZ.
SPDN has the higher dividend yield at 3.32%, compared with 0.00% for SMZ.
SMZ tracks NuScale Power Corporation (SMR), while SPDN tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Tradr and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.49% for SMZ and 0.50% for SPDN.
Find the right allocation for SMZ and SPDN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer