SMZ vs. SEF
SMZ (Tradr 2X Short SMR Daily ETF) and SEF (ProShares Short Financials) are both Inverse Equities funds - SMZ tracks the NuScale Power Corporation (SMR) while SEF tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Financials Index (-100%). Both are passively managed. Their 0.26 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. SMZ charges 1.49%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for SEF.
Performance
SMZ vs. SEF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SMZ
- 1D
- 4.06%
- 1M
- 7.24%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
SEF
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- -2.18%
- 6M
- -5.14%
- YTD
- -2.43%
- 1Y
- -7.05%
- 3Y*
- -11.58%
- 5Y*
- -7.41%
- 10Y*
- -12.37%
- ALL TIME*
- -13.88%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $302.73K | $217.23K | $276.76K | |
| $795.18K | $775.91K | $1.24M |
SMZ vs. SEF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SMZ Tradr 2X Short SMR Daily ETF | -1.46% |
SEF ProShares Short Financials | -5.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMZ and SEF is 0.26, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2026 | 0.26 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMZ vs. SEF — Risk / Return Rank
SMZ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SEF
SMZ vs. SEF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Short SMR Daily ETF (SMZ) and ProShares Short Financials (SEF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SMZ | SEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.95 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.34 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -0.84 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SMZ vs. SEF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMZ drawdown since its inception was -77.30%, smaller than the maximum SEF drawdown of -96.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMZ and SEF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMZ | SEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.30% | -96.53% | +19.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -15.98% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -39.77% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -41.98% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -73.36% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -61.42% | -96.50% | +35.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.92% | -82.82% | +41.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 6.40% | — |
Volatility
SMZ vs. SEF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMZ | SEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.01% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.02% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 188.99% | 14.64% | +174.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 188.99% | 17.91% | +171.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 188.99% | 20.46% | +168.53% |
SMZ vs. SEF - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMZ has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than SEF's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMZ vs. SEF - Dividend Comparison
SMZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.44%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SEF ProShares Short Financials | 3.44% | 4.33% | 5.72% | 4.43% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.12% | 1.25% | 0.41% |
SMZ Tradr 2X Short SMR Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMZ and SEF have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SEF is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SEF is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.49% for SMZ.
SEF has the higher dividend yield at 3.44%, compared with 0.00% for SMZ.
SMZ tracks NuScale Power Corporation (SMR), while SEF tracks Dow Jones U.S. Financials Index (-100%). They also come from different issuers: Tradr and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.49% for SMZ and 0.95% for SEF.
Find the right allocation for SMZ and SEF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer