SMZ vs. SARK
SMZ (Tradr 2X Short SMR Daily ETF) and SARK (Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds. SMZ is passively managed, while SARK is actively managed. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SMZ charges 1.49%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for SARK.
Performance
SMZ vs. SARK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SMZ
- 1D
- 22.81%
- 1M
- 29.65%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SARK
- 1D
- 7.13%
- 1M
- 5.63%
- YTD
- -2.68%
- 6M
- 3.52%
- 1Y
- -32.77%
- 3Y*
- -29.15%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMZ vs. SARK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SMZ Tradr 2X Short SMR Daily ETF | -13.39% |
SARK Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF | -8.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMZ and SARK is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2026 | 0.75 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMZ vs. SARK — Risk / Return Rank
SMZ
SARK
SMZ vs. SARK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Short SMR Daily ETF (SMZ) and Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF (SARK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMZ | SARK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.90 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.19 | -0.22 | +0.03 |
Drawdowns
SMZ vs. SARK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMZ drawdown since its inception was -77.30%, roughly equal to the maximum SARK drawdown of -81.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMZ and SARK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMZ | SARK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.30% | -81.07% | +3.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -35.35% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -74.42% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -62.88% | -78.52% | +15.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.15% | -46.52% | +14.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 30.63% | — |
Volatility
SMZ vs. SARK - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMZ | SARK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 10.92% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 25.90% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 191.86% | 36.71% | +155.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 191.86% | 56.30% | +135.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 191.86% | 56.30% | +135.56% |
SMZ vs. SARK - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMZ has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than SARK's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMZ vs. SARK - Dividend Comparison
SMZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SARK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.90%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SARK Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF | 2.90% | 2.82% | 15.49% | 12.57% | 25.22% |
SMZ Tradr 2X Short SMR Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMZ and SARK have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SARK is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SARK is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.49% for SMZ.
SARK has the higher dividend yield at 2.90%, compared with 0.00% for SMZ.
They also come from different issuers: Tradr and AXS. Their fees differ too: 1.49% for SMZ and 0.75% for SARK.
Find the right allocation for SMZ and SARK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer