PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMZ vs. RGTU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMZ vs. RGTU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Short SMR Daily ETF (SMZ) and Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF (RGTU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


SMZ

1D
22.81%
1M
29.65%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

RGTU

1D
-29.18%
1M
-13.48%
YTD
-48.36%
6M
-69.94%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMZ vs. RGTU - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SMZ and RGTU is -0.72, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2026

-0.72

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMZ vs. RGTU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Short SMR Daily ETF (SMZ) and Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF (RGTU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SMZ vs. RGTU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SMZRGTUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.19

-0.03

-0.16

Drawdowns

SMZ vs. RGTU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMZ drawdown since its inception was -77.30%, smaller than the maximum RGTU drawdown of -96.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMZ and RGTU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMZRGTUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.30%

-96.96%

+19.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-62.88%

-94.23%

+31.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.15%

-62.46%

+30.31%

Volatility

SMZ vs. RGTU - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMZRGTUDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

191.86%

220.94%

-29.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

191.86%

220.94%

-29.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

191.86%

220.94%

-29.08%

SMZ vs. RGTU - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMZ has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than RGTU's 1.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

SMZ vs. RGTU - Dividend Comparison

SMZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RGTU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 39.95%.


PositionTTM2025
RGTU
Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF
39.95%20.63%
SMZ
Tradr 2X Short SMR Daily ETF
0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SMZ and RGTU have a correlation of -0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, RGTU is cheaper at 1.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

RGTU is cheaper with a 1.30% expense ratio, compared with 1.49% for SMZ.

RGTU has the higher dividend yield at 39.95%, compared with 0.00% for SMZ.

SMZ is categorized as Inverse Equities, while RGTU is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.49% for SMZ and 1.30% for RGTU.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMZ and RGTU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer