SMZ vs. RGTU

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

SMZ (Tradr 2X Short SMR Daily ETF) and RGTU (Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SMZ is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the NuScale Power Corporation (SMR), while RGTU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Tradr. SMZ is passively managed, while RGTU is actively managed. Their -0.75 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. SMZ charges 1.49%/yr vs 1.30%/yr for RGTU.

Performance

SMZ vs. RGTU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Short SMR Daily ETF (SMZ) and Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF (RGTU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

SMZ

• 1D: 4.06%
• 1M: 7.24%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

RGTU

• 1D: 1.46%
• 1M: -36.13%
• 6M: -62.74%
• YTD: -76.61%
• 1Y: -68.03%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -52.05%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
RGTU Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF	$1.69M	$1.58M	$6.01M
SMZ Tradr 2X Short SMR Daily ETF	$795.18K	$775.91K	$1.24M

SMZ vs. RGTU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
SMZ Tradr 2X Short SMR Daily ETF	-1.46%
RGTU Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF	-54.44%

Correlation

The correlation between SMZ and RGTU is -0.75, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2026	-0.75

Return for Risk

SMZ vs. RGTU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SMZ

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

RGTU

RGTU Risk / Return Rank: 11
RGTU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
RGTU Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
RGTU Omega Ratio Rank: 19
RGTU Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
RGTU Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SMZ vs. RGTU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Short SMR Daily ETF (SMZ) and Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF (RGTU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SMZ	RGTU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	-0.33	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	0.73	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.08	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	-0.71	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	-0.88	—

Drawdowns

SMZ vs. RGTU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMZ drawdown since its inception was -77.30%, smaller than the maximum RGTU drawdown of -97.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMZ and RGTU.

Drawdown Indicators

	SMZ	RGTU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-77.30%	-97.93%	+20.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-97.93%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-61.42%	-97.39%	+35.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-40.92%	-66.82%	+25.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	79.64%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SMZ	RGTU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	54.17%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	143.29%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	188.99%	213.12%	-24.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	188.99%	215.68%	-26.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	188.99%	215.68%	-26.69%

SMZ vs. RGTU - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMZ has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than RGTU's 1.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

SMZ vs. RGTU - Dividend Comparison

SMZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RGTU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 88.22%.

Position	TTM	2025
RGTU Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF	88.22%	20.63%
SMZ Tradr 2X Short SMR Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SMZ and RGTU in my portfolio?

SMZ and RGTU have a correlation of -0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SMZ or RGTU?

On fees, RGTU is cheaper at 1.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SMZ or RGTU?

RGTU is cheaper with a 1.30% expense ratio, compared with 1.49% for SMZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SMZ or RGTU?

RGTU has the higher dividend yield at 88.22%, compared with 0.00% for SMZ.

What is the main difference between SMZ and RGTU?

SMZ is categorized as Inverse Equities, while RGTU is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.49% for SMZ and 1.30% for RGTU.