SMYY vs. LOCT
SMYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST SMCI ETF) and LOCT (Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - October) are both Options Trading funds. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SMYY charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for LOCT.
Performance
SMYY vs. LOCT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMYY achieves a 6.70% return, which is significantly higher than LOCT's 2.29% return.
SMYY
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- 3.58%
- YTD
- 6.70%
- 6M
- -8.56%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LOCT
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 0.54%
- YTD
- 2.29%
- 6M
- 2.92%
- 1Y
- 5.75%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMYY vs. LOCT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SMYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST SMCI ETF | 6.70% | -27.52% |
LOCT Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - October | 2.29% | 1.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMYY and LOCT is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2025 | 0.39 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMYY vs. LOCT — Risk / Return Rank
SMYY
LOCT
SMYY vs. LOCT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST SMCI ETF (SMYY) and Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - October (LOCT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMYY | LOCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.67 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.98 | 1.69 | -2.67 |
Drawdowns
SMYY vs. LOCT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMYY drawdown since its inception was -36.84%, which is greater than LOCT's maximum drawdown of -4.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMYY and LOCT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMYY | LOCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.84% | -4.69% | -32.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -1.23% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.74% | -0.06% | -28.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.15% | -0.14% | -25.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.23% | — |
Volatility
SMYY vs. LOCT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMYY | LOCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.22% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 1.67% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.69% | 2.16% | +30.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.69% | 3.60% | +29.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.69% | 3.60% | +29.09% |
SMYY vs. LOCT - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMYY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than LOCT's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMYY vs. LOCT - Dividend Comparison
SMYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 146.89%, more than LOCT's 5.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
LOCT Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - October | 5.14% | 5.12% | 6.27% | 1.64% |
SMYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST SMCI ETF | 146.89% | 53.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMYY and LOCT have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LOCT is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LOCT is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for SMYY.
SMYY has the higher dividend yield at 146.89%, compared with 5.14% for LOCT.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for SMYY and 0.79% for LOCT.
Find the right allocation for SMYY and LOCT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer